Page 148 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 148

Reception of religion and media  137

            to a question about values. She sees it as important that kids be raised to
            “have their own mind, to not be influenced by the outside culture,” she
            says, “and maybe just the belief that the outside culture isn’t necessarily
            positive.”
              Distinction from the outside culture is thus quite important to Priscilla.
            Its influences are negative, and its vectors into the home (once again, tele-
            vision being the primary one) need to be confronted as much as possible.
            In describing her own values, Priscilla describes them very much in
            reflexive, autonomous, metaphysical, “seeker” terms.
               I would describe them [her values] as really functioning from your true
               self. I guess that is something that I worked on myself, trying to peel
               off the layers that I’ve accumulated from people saying how I should
               be and what is good and what is bad. I was raised Catholic so lots of
               polarity with good/bad. And, just raising the kids to be aligned with
               their inner selves and their true being and act from that place and not
               act because Mom says you should act a certain way. Although, you
               still have to work within the culture so it is a little tricky to teach them
               good manners and stuff. But I still allow what I hope is enough of
               their true being to survive and not get buried. So that is really impor-
               tant. That and the belief in God, the universe, the spiritual energy.
               That is really important and we talk about that a lot. I try not to make
               that different. It is just all together. Kind of like when I lived in Japan.
               You are not separate from the sacred it is just all together.
            Typical of the late-modern, autonomous sensibility, she makes a clear
            distinction between the traditional Catholicism of her roots, and what she
            sees as a more individual, self-generated spirituality. Spirituality, she says,
            is not something that one just does on Sunday.

               No, right. It is not something you have to go to church for and you
               don’t have to dress a certain way. It is acting from your core and your
               heart and your loving being, I guess . . . and respecting nature and
               other people. I see that with organized religion that does not always
               happen. To me, it creates separation and judging . . . criticism. To me
               that breaks off that flow of compassion.

            She sees a clear distinction between the traditional ways of church religion
            and what she finds the more ideal spirituality she has discovered in
            Buddhism. In the process, she articulates the sort of critique of traditional
            religion that underlies individuals’ interests in what I have called “repressed
            modes” of religious experience. “I know there were ways of getting [spiritu-
            ality] through church but it just seems that it was too hard. There are too
            many layers to peel off. Where in Buddhism it seems like it is more just
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153