Page 205 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 205

194  Believers, dogmatists, and secularists

              David: . . . that’s something that we’re trying to instill in our kids is
                 that . . . that there is good things out there and if you look at the good
                 things, or look for the good . . . that’s what you need to be looking for.
                 I mean, you can find, I was just telling you about the bad things about
                 all these shows and stuff, but, and there’s good . . . in the same
                 amount there’s as much good and things that way. I’m not as, you
                 know, as far as The Simpsons, I . . . I’m like, you can find good there
                 too if you really look hard enough. I mean, they’re cartoons, if you
                 don’t take them to heart [laughs] you know, but they’re not kids’
                 cartoons. A lot of cartoons are not.
              Interviewer: So you have less of a problem with The Simpsons than . . .
              David: Than what she (Kathy) does, yeah. And the Rugrats do not bother
                 me. [laughs] I just, but, you know, it’s the thing, but it’s, you know, it’s
                 the same thing with, whatever, scary movies, or whatever. . . .

              There is an echo of others we’ve heard from in David’s assertion that
              media use should be about individual ideas and responsibility. Unlike
              many, though, he suspects that the so-called “mainstream media” are not
              trustworthy sources of news or information. He looks to a multiplicity of
              sources to avoid being ideologically misled.

              David: I don’t like Dateline and 20/20 shows because most of them are a
                 crock, I mean, they’re one person’s opinion, um, and it’s the same with
                 any news article that you read in the newspaper, or radio, or whatever,
                 it’s one person’s opinion that’s bringing you that story. And . . . that’s
                 why I like, you know, the Internet newspaper news because then you
                 can read six different reporters on the same subject, and. . . .

              There is some of what we expected to find among dogmatists in the
              Muellers. They make some clear distinctions between the world repre-
              sented by the media and the world represented by the Mormon faith. They
              tend to refer to the Church and its ideas in relation to their media choices,
              though it is hard to see how the resulting behavior actually represents
              those ideas in any systematic way. They don’t at the same time see their
              role as prohibiting things as much as helping their children learn to make
              their own choices.


              The Donegals
              Glenn Donegal, who we met in Chapter 4, exhibits many of the character-
              istics of what Roof would call “dogmatism.” He has left Catholicism for
              Evangelical Protestantism, but treats the latter more as a set of codes or
              doctrines than is the case with the “born-again believers” we’ve met.
              Glenn seems “dualist” in his understanding of the media, speaking from
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210