Page 260 - Religion in the Media Age Media, Religion & Culture
P. 260

Public religious culture post-09/11/01  249

               beyond its reach. We confront, then, the possibility of a new order of
               sublime – suited to the technoworld of the postmodern – a relational
               sublime. 46

            Events of common suffering and vicitimization are, as we’ve seen,
            dramatic moments of relatedness, with connection and commonality the
            whole point. This is a dimension of the “new civil religion” that separates
            it from received notions. On a level more related to the media, though, is
            the simple fact that the experience is, in the first instance, one that is expe-
            rienced through the media. 9/11 was instantaneous, real, and visual. In a
            long and established line of such events, a “priesthood” of media figures,
            including reporters and anchors, held important roles in the experience,
            conveying important ideas about its meaning and providing a narrative of
            its unfolding across time. As Dayan and Katz point out, this is a well-
            established and long-accepted role, where conventional practices and
                                                                47
            expectations are suspended for the sake of a larger purpose. The ritual
            vocabularies through which the media narrate events like 9/11 have
            become complex, routine, and conventional. While a detailed study from
            this perspective remains to be done, there is evidence of one important
            element of these conventionalized media narratives in Linenthal’s accounts
            of the Oklahoma City bombing. Too quickly, he notes, voices in the media
            began to speak of “healing” and “closure.” Whereas it can be argued that
            such violence can never truly be healed, Linenthal contends, newspaper
            columnists, television anchors and reporters all began talking of closure
            for the events. 48  “Closure” and “the healing process” (a term heard
            frequently in the local television coverage of the Columbine massacre) are
            concerns of a priesthood oriented toward conventionalized rituals more
            than they are concerns of journalists covering a process that might never
            (as Linenthal argues) come to closure.
              In Oklahoma City, at Columbine, and near the World Trade Center,
            Pentagon, and Western Pennsylvania sites, the “democratic” claiming of a
            role in commemoration involved the physical claiming of a location, typi-
            cally a fence. 49  Fences surrounding the World Trade Center site and a
            nearby church became the sites of spontaneous shrines filled with the
            objects of the “vocabulary of memorialization.” Flags, poems, teddy bears,
            news clippings, posters, banners, clothing, and more conventional para-
            phernalia including candles and wreaths covered the site. Many of these
            came from outside the US, a testament to the global nature of the events.
              The notion that there is an evolving trajectory of such commemoration
            is supported by the seeming emergence of such practices in smaller, more
            localized events. For example, a tragic murder of a young shop attendant
            in my home town stimulated a familiar response. Within hours of the
            news, a spontaneous shrine appeared at the storefront where the killing
            occurred. It grew and developed over the coming days, and contained
   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265