Page 164 -
P. 164

References  151




                  3.  Why are diaries good for collecting data on user-defined events?
                  4.  What aspects of hand-held or mobile devices make them appropriate for diary studies?
                  5.  Why is strict random sampling not necessary in diary studies?
                  6.  What is the main difference between feedback diaries and elicitation diaries?

                  7.  Why is it important to clearly define appropriate definitions of terminology for
                    diary participants?
                  8.  Why do you not want to pay participants for each diary entry?

                  9.  What is generally considered to be the longest appropriate time period for a
                    diary study?




                  RESEARCH DESIGN EXERCISE
                  Imagine designing a research study to learn more about the use of genealogy (the
                  study of family history) websites, applications, and databases. Not much is previ-
                  ously known about the user habits for this type of work. What types of participants
                  might be appropriate for a research study? What characteristics might they have?
                  Why might a diary study be superior to a survey or observation study? Specifically,
                  provide information on how a feedback diary and an elicitation diary might be imple-
                  mented for this study. If the diary was relatively structured, what types of questions
                  should be asked? Would time be an important consideration in this type of diary?
                  Would random sampling of time be appropriate?



                    REFERENCES
                  Adler, A., Gujar, A., Harrison, B., O’Hara, K., Sellen, A., 1998. A diary study of work- related
                    reading:  design  implications  for  digital  reading  devices.  In:  Proceedings  of  the  ACM
                    Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 241–248.
                  Alaszewski, A., 2006. Using Diaries for Social Research. Sage Publications, London.
                  Brandt, J., Weiss, N., Klemmer, S., 2007. txt 4 l8r: lowering the burden for diary studies under
                    mobile conditions. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Human Factors in
                    Computing Systems, pp. 2303–2308.
                  Brown, B., Sellen, A., O’Hara, K., 2000. A diary study of information capture in working life.
                    In: Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,
                    pp. 438–445.
                  Carter, S., Mankoff, J., 2005. When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary
                    studies. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing
                    Systems, pp. 899–908.
                  Ceaparu, I., Lazar, J., Bessiere, K., Robinson, J., Shneiderman, B., 2004. Determining causes
                    and severity of end-user frustration. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
                    17 (3), 333–356.
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169