Page 497 -

References 489

Hoffman, D.H., Carter, D., Viglucci Lopez, C.R., Guo, A.X., Latfif, S.Y., Craig, D., 2015.
Report to the Special Committee of the Board of the American Psychological Association:
Independent Review Relating to APA Ethics Guidelines, National Security Investigations,
and Torture. Retrieved March 20, 2017 from http://www.apa.org/independent-review/re-
vised-report.pdf.
Hourcade, J.P., 2015. Child-Computer Interaction. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform
ISBN 978-1514397251. Available from http://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~hourcade/book/
child-computer-interaction-first-edition.pdf (accessed March 19, 2017).
Hwang, W., Salvendy, G., 2010. Number of people required for usability evaluation: the
10+/−2 rule. Communications of the ACM 53 (5), 130–133.
Jagatic, T.N., Johnson, N.A., Jakobsson, M., Menczer, F., 2007. Social phishing.
Communications of the ACM 50 (10), 94–100.
Jakobsson, M., Finn, P., Johnson, N., 2008. Why and how to perform fraud experiments. IEEE
Security and Privacy 6 (2), 66–68.
Jones, J.H., 1993. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. Free Press, New York.
Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M., Als, B., Høegh, R., 2004. Is it worth the hassle? Exploring the added
value of evaluating the usability of context-aware mobile systems in the field. In: Brewster,
S., Dunlop, M. (Eds.), Mobile Human-Computer Interaction—MobileHCI 2004, vol. 3160.
Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 61–73.
Kjeldskov, J., Skov, M.B., 2014. Was it worth the hassle? Ten years of mobile HCI research dis-
cussions on lab and field evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference
on Human-Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices’ Services. ACM, Toronto, ON,
Canada, pp. 43–52.
Kramer, A.D.I., Guillory, J.E., Hancock, J.T., 2014. Experimental evidence of massive-scale
emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 111 (24), 8788–8790.
Larson, K., Czerwinski, M., 1998. Web page design: implications of memory, structure and
scent for information retrieval. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing
Systems Los Angeles. ACM Press, CA, United States.
Lazar, J. (Ed.), 2007. Universal Usability: Designing Computer Interfaces for Diverse User
Populations. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
Levitt, S.D., List, J.A., 2011. Was there really a Hawthorne effect at the Hawthorne plant?
An analysis of the original illumination experiments. American Economic Journal: Applied
Economics 3 (1), 224–238.
Luger, E., Rodden, T., 2013a. An informed view on consent for UbiComp. In: Proceedings
of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing.
ACM, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 529–538.
Luger, E., Rodden, T., 2013b. Terms of agreement: rethinking consent for pervasive comput-
ing. Interacting with Computers 25 (3), 229–241.
Macefield, R., 2007. Usability studies and the Hawthorne effect. Journal of Usability Studies 2 (3).
McCambridge, J., Witton, J., Elbourne, D.R., 2014. Systematic review of the Hawthorne ef-
fect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical
Epidemiology 67 (3), 267–277.
Merritt, M.W., Labrique, A.B., Katz, J., Rashid, M., West Jr., K.P., Pettit, J., 2010. A field
training guide for human subjects research ethics. PLoS Medicine 7 (10), e1000349.
Milgram, S., 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
67, 371–378.