Page 80 -
P. 80

3.6  Experimental procedures     65




                     Both physical and social environmental factors may introduce systematic er-
                  rors into the observed data. For instance, a study that examines the performance of
                  a speech-recognition application may yield lower recognition error rates than the
                  actual value if there is a significant level of ambient noise during the experiment
                  session. Even when the study investigates applications other than speech, loud en-
                  vironmental noise may distract the participants or induce fatigue. Regarding social
                  factors, a participant with a person watching over his shoulder may perform differ-
                  ently from a participant who is seated alone. Environmental factors may cause more
                  problems when the experiment is not conducted in a lab, but in locations such as the
                  participant's home or workplace. The following guidelines can help us avoid or con-
                  trol environment-induced biases:
                  •  In a lab setting, make sure the room is quiet, the lighting is appropriate, and the
                     chairs and tables are comfortable. The room should be clean and tidy, without
                     notable distractions.
                  •  Whenever possible, the participant should be seated alone and the experimenter
                     can observe the session from another room via a one-way mirror or monitors.
                  •  In a field study, the experimenters should visit the location before the scheduled
                     time to confirm that the setting meets the requirements of the study.
                     Finally, it is important to realize that, no matter how hard you try to avoid biases,
                  they can never be completely eliminated. A well-designed experiment with lots of
                  consideration for controlling bias can improve the data, making the observed results
                  closer to the actual values, but still subject to the impact of biases. Therefore, we
                  should be careful when reporting the findings, even when the study results are sta-
                  tistically significant.


                  3.6  EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

                  Experiments are conducted in dramatically different fields to answer a myriad of
                  questions. Experiments in the HCI field, similar to many studies in sociology or
                  psychology, typically involve human subjects. Studying human subjects is quite dif-
                  ferent from studying metal or plant reactions, or other animals, and introduces many
                  interesting issues or challenges. The concerns and practices of working with human
                  subjects are discussed in detail in Chapter 15. In this section, we briefly introduce the
                  procedures for experiments that study human subjects.
                     In the lifecycle of an HCI experiment, we typically go through the following process:

                  1.  Identify a research hypothesis.
                  2.  Specify the design of the study.
                  3.  Run a pilot study to test the design, the system, and the study instruments.
                  4.  Recruit participants.
                  5.  Run the actual data collection sessions.
                  6.  Analyze the data.
                  7.  Report the results.
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85