Page 31 - Reservoir Formation Damage
P. 31

Mineralogy and Mineral Sensitivity of Petroleum-Bearing Formations  15

               Amaefule  et  al.  (1988)  point  out  that  there  are  five  primary  factors
             affecting  the  mineralogical  sensitivity of  sedimentary  formations:

                1.  Mineralogy  and  chemical  composition  determine  the
                  a.  dissolution  of  minerals,
                  b.  swelling  of  minerals,  and
                  c.  precipitation  of  new  minerals.
               2.  Mineral  abundance prevails  the  quantity  of  sensitive  minerals.
               3.  Mineral  size  plays  an  important  role,  because
                  a.  mineral  sensitivity  is  proportional  to  the  surface  area  of  miner-
                     als,  and
                  b.  mineral  size  determines  the  surface  area  to  volume  ratio  of
                     particles.
               4.  Mineral  morphology  is  important,  because
                  a.  mineral  morphology  determines  the  grain  shape,  and  therefore
                     the  surface  area  to  volume  ratio,  and
                  b.  minerals with platy,  foliated,  acicular, filiform,  or bladed  shapes,
                     such  as  clay  minerals,  have  high  surface  area  to  volume  ratio.
               5.  Location  of  minerals  is  important  from  the  point  of  their  role  in  for-
                  mation  damage.  The  authigenic minerals  are  especially  susceptible to
                  alteration  because  they  are  present  in  the  pore  space  as  pore-lining,
                  pore-filling,  and  pore-bridging  deposits  and  they  can  be  exposed
                  directly  to  the  fluids  injected  into  the  near-wellbore  formation.

               Mungan   (1989)  states  that  clay  damage  depends  on  (1)  the  type
                                                               +   +    2+
             and  the  amount  of  the  exchangeable  cations,  such  as  K ,  Na ,  Ca ,  and
             (2)  the  layered  structure  existing  in  the  clay  minerals.  Mungan  (1989)
             describes  the  properties  and  damage  processes  of  the  three  clay  groups
             as  following:

               1.  Kaolinite  has  a  two-layer  structure  (see  Figure  2-3),  K +  exchange
                  cation,  and  a  small  base  exchange  capacity,  and  is  basically  a
                  nonswelling  clay  but  will  easily  disperse  and  move.
               2.  Montmorillonite  has  a three-layer  structure (see  Figure  2-4),  a large
                  base  exchange  capacity  of  90  to  150  meq/lOOg  and  will  readily
                           +
                  adsorb Na ,  all  leading  to  a high  degree  of  swelling  and  dispersion.
               3.  Illites  are  interlayered  (see  Figure  2-5).  Therefore,  illites  combine
                  the  worst  characteristics  of  the  dispersible  and  the  swellable  clays.
                  The  illites  are  most  difficult  to  stabilize.

               Sodium-montmorillonite  swells  more  than  calcium-montmorillonite
             because  the calcium cation  is strongly adsorbed  compared  to the  sodium cat-
             ions  (Rogers,  1963).  Therefore,  when  the  clays  are  hydrated  in  aqueous
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36