Page 21 -
P. 21

2                                    Commercial Robot Manipulators

            Flexible Robotic Workcells

            In factory automation and elsewhere it was once common to use fixed
            layouts built around conveyors or other transportation systems in which
            each robot performed a specific task. These assembly lines had distinct
            workstations, each performing a dedicated function. Robots have been
            used at the workstation level to perform operations such as assembly,
            drilling, surface finishing, welding, palletizing, and so on. In the assembly
            line, parts are routed sequentially to the workstations by the transport
            system. Such systems are very expensive to install, require a cadre of
            engineering experts to design and program, and are extremely difficult to
            modify or reprogram as needs change. In today’s high-mix low-volume
            (HMLV) manufacturing scenario, these characteristics tolled the death knell
            for such rigid antiquated designs.



















                       Figure 1.1.1: UTA’s Automation and Robotics Test Cell.


              In the assembly line, the robot is restricted by placing it into a rigid
            sequential system. Robots are versatile machines with many capabilities,
            and their potential can be significantly increased by using them as a basis
            for flexible robotic workcells [Decelle 1988], [Jamshidi et al. 1992], [Pugh
            1983] such as the UTA Automation and Robotics Test Cell in Figure 1.1.1.
            In the flexible robotic workcell, robots are used for part handling, assembly,
            and other process operations. By reprogramming the robots one changes the
            entire functionality of the workcell. The workcell is designed to make full
            use of the workspace of the robots, and components such as milling machines,
            drilling machines, vibratory part feeders, and so on are placed within the
            robots’ workspaces to allow servicing by the robots. Contrary to the assembly
            line, the physical layout does not impose a priori a fixed sequencing of the
            operations or jobs. Thus, as product requirements change, all that is required
            is to reprogram the workcell in software [Mireles and Lewis 2001]. The




            Copyright © 2004 by Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26