Page 177 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 177

RESULTS OF IN SITU STRESS MEASUREMENTS



























              Figure 5.11 Variation with depth  the problem. These include such factors as the possibility of a true cohesive component
              below surface of (a) measured val-  of discontinuity strength and the possible dilatant properties of the discontinuity in
              ues of in situ vertical stress, p zz , and
                                        shear. Questions to be considered concerning stress measurement results include the
              (b) ratio of average measured horizon-
                                        probable error in the determination of both principal stress magnitudes and directions,
              tal stresses to the vertical stress (data
                                        and the proximity of the stress measurement site to the discontinuity. Thus the closer
              compiled by Windsor, 2003, after
              Aydan and Kawamoto, 1997).  the measurement site to the discontinuity, the more significance to be attached to
                                        the no-slip criterion. Only when these sorts of issues have been considered in detail
                                        should the inadmissibility of a solution for the field stress tensor be decided.
                                        5.5 Results of in situ stress measurements

                                        A comprehensive collation of the results of measurement of the pre-mining state of
                                        stress, at the locations of various mining, civil and petroleum engineering projects,
                                        reported by Brown and Hoek (1978), was updated by Windsor (2003). The results
                                        presented in Figure 5.11 consist of data for about 900 determinations of in situ states
                                        of stress. Although data exist for depths extending to 7 km, those presented are for
                                        depths down to 3 km, which is the range of interest in most mining projects. The first
                                        observation from this figure is that the measurements of p zz (in MPa) are scattered
                                        about the trend line
                                                                    p zz = 0.027z

                                        where z (in m) is the depth below ground surface. Since 27 kN m −3  represents a
                                        reasonable average unit weight for most rocks, it appears that the vertical component
                                        of stress is closely related to depth stress. A further observation concerns the variation
                                        with depth of the parameter k, defined as the ratio of the average of the horizontal
                                        stresses to the vertical stresses: i.e.

                                                                 k = (p xx + p yy )/2p zz

                                        The data are bounded on the lower side by k = 0.3, while the upper bound is defined
                                        159
   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182