Page 453 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 453

LONGWALL MINING IN HARD ROCK


























              Figure 15.5 (a) Mining plan, and  stope by total extraction is given by equation 10.88; i.e.
              (b) normalised reduction in energy
              change, for partial extraction of a flat-               W r = LHp
              lying, narrow, tabular orebody (after
              Salamon, 1974).
                                        Dividing equation 15.1 by equation 10.88 and substituting the expression for the
                                        critical span given by equation 10.86; i.e

                                                                 L 0 = GH/[(1 − 	)p]

                                        leads to the result
                                                            W r /W r = 1 + (S/ L 0 )  n (cos  )       (15.2)

                                        Figure 15.5b shows a plot of  W r /W r against extraction ratio, l/S, for varying values
                                        of S/L 0 . Note that, even for quite high extraction ratios, major reductions in energy
                                        release rates are achieved by using partial extraction.
                                          The use of stabilising pillars as they are known has been effective in reducing seis-
                                        micity in a number of deep South African gold mines (e.g. Hagan, 1988, Vieira et al.,
                                        2001). The major disadvantage of the method is that in deep mines with potentially
                                        high stress conditions something like 15% of the ore reserves may be sterilised in
                                        stabilising pillars. For high extraction ratios, the pillars may be subject to particularly
                                        high stress concentrations at their edges and may even suffer bearing capacity failure.
                                        (c) Backfilling the mined void with tailings, sand or waste rock has great poten-
                                            tial for limiting convergence and for providing both regional and local support.
                                            Backfill has two significant virtues. First, its presence reduces the permissible
                                            convergence, limiting both the ultimate convergence volume and the displace-
                                            ment induced at each increment of mining. Second, the rock mass must do work
                                            on the fill to deform it; in the process large amounts of energy can be absorbed
                                            (Salamon, 1983). Although the benefits likely to be associated with the use of
                                            backfill were recognised in the 1960s (Cook, N.G.W. et al., 1966), the method
                                            was not adopted in practice because of apparently high costs and perceived op-
                                            erational problems. In particular, it was believed that it would be difficult to
                                        435
   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458