Page 460 - Rock Mechanics For Underground Mining
P. 460

LONGWALL AND CAVING MINING METHODS






























              Figure 15.8  Vertical stress redistri-  immediately behind the face and near the rib side. As shown in sectionsY–Yand
              bution in the plane of the seam around  X 2 – X 2 in Figure 15.8, the vertical stress in the mined-out area or goaf increases
              a longwall coal face (after Whittaker,
                                        with distance from the face and the rib side. Where full closure of the mined void
              1974).
                                        occurs, the full overburden stress, p, is transmitted. Wilson (1977, 1981) developed
                                        an approximate analysis of the distribution of vertical stress around a longwall panel
                                        that reproduces many of the features of Figure 15.8. This analysis uses a stress balance
                                        method in which the total vertical force applied over a large plan area must remain
                                        equal to that arising from the overburden load, even after part of the seam has been
                                        removed.
                                          Finite element stress analyses carried out by Everling (1973) and by Park and Gall
                                        (1989) gave qualitatively similar results to those illustrated in Figure 15.8, although
                                        the concentration of vertical stress at the corners of a single longwall face was not
                                        as marked as that postulated by Whittaker (1974). These and other studies predicted
                                        that the maximum abutment vertical stresses of four to six times the in situ vertical
                                        stress occurs close to the longwall face. More recent results obtained for Australian
                                        conditions by Kelly et al. (1996, 2002) from field monitoring and FLAC2D and 3D
                                        numerical analyses depart in several important respects from the previously accepted
                                        model.
                                          Figure 15.9 shows the variation in the distribution of computed vertical stress with
                                        distance from the goaf edge for the Gordonstone Mine, Queensland, Australia. In this
                                        case, the maximum abutment stress is only twice the overburden stress and occurs
                                        about 10 m from the rib side and ahead of the longwall face. Kellyet al. (1996) attribute
                                        this significant difference from the traditional model to two main causes. Firstly, the
                                        major principal in situ stress at Gordonstone is horizontal, about 2.4 times the vertical
                                        stress and oriented approximately parallel to the roadways. The horizontal relaxation
                                        into the goaf is quite significant and produces a decrease in the local vertical stress.
                                        Secondly, shearing through intact rock and along bedding planes reduces the load
                                        carrying capacity of the rock adjacent to the longwall zone. This effectively transfers
                                        the abutment peak away from the longwall and reduces its magnitude.
                                        442
   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465