Page 332 - Schaum's Outline of Differential Equations
P. 332

CHAP.  32]              SECOND-ORDER  BOUNDARY-VALUE   PROBLEMS                      315



                                               2
                                                                            2
               (b)  The  equation  is equivalent to  (xy')'  + (x  + l)y  + 'ky  = 0; hence p(x)  = x,  q(x)  = x  + 1 and  w(x)  = 1. Since  p(x)
                   is zero  at a point in the interval  [0, 1], this is not a Sturm-Liouville problem.
               (c)  Here p(x)  = 1/x,  q(x)  = x,  and  w(x)  = 1. Since p(x)  is not continuous  in  [0,  1], in particular at x = 0, this is not
                   a  Sturm-Liouville  problem.
               (d)  The  equation  can  be  rewritten  as  (y')'  + X(l + x)y  = 0;  hence  p(x)  = 1,  q(x)  = 0,  and  w(x)  = 1 +x.  This  is  a
                   Sturm-Liouville  problem.
               (e)  The  equation,  in  its  present  form,  is  not  equivalent  to  Eq.  (32.6);  this  is  not  a  Sturm-Liouville  problem.
                                                    x
                                                                     x
                                                              x
                   However,  if we first multiply the equation  by e~ , we obtain  (e y')'  + Xe~ y  = 0; this is a Sturm-Liouville  problem
                            1
                   with p(x)  = e , q(x)  = 0, and  w(x)  = e~ . x
         32.15.  Prove that Eq.  (32.6) is equivalent to Eq.  (32.8) if and only if  a' 2(x)  = a^x).
                  Applying the product  rule of differentiation to (32.6), we  find  that

               Setting a 2(x)  =p(x),  cii(x)  =p'(x),  a Q(x)  = q(x),  and  r(x)  = w(x),  it follows that (_/), which is (32.6) rewritten, is precisely
               (29.8)  with a' 2(x)  =p'(x)  =  a^x).
                  Conversely,  if  a' 2(x)  = cii(x).  then  (32.8)  has  the form


               which  is  equivalent  to  [a 2(;e);y'] + a 0(x)y  + hr(x)y  = 0.  This  last  equation  is  precisely  (32.6)  with  p(x)  =  a 2(x),
               q(x)  = a a(x),  and  w(x)  = r(x).

         32.16.  Show  that  if  Eq.  (32.8)  is  multiplied  by  ,  the  resulting  equation  is  equivalent  to
               Eq. (32.6).
                  Multiplying (32.8)  by I(x),  we  obtain


               which  can be rewritten as

               Divide (1) by a 2(x)  and then setp(x)  = l(x),  q(x) = I(x)a a(x)la 2(x)  and  w(x)  = I(x)r(x)la 2(x);  the resulting equation  is
               precisely  (32.6).  Note that  since I(x)  is an exponential  and  since  a 2(x)  does  not vanish, I(x)  is positive.

         32.17.  Transform                 into Eq. (32.6) by means of the procedure outlined in Problem 32.16.

                  Here a 2(x)  = 1 and cii(x)  = 2x; hence  a.i(x)la 2(x)  = 2x and  I(x)  =  . Multiplying the given  differential
               equation  by I(x),  we  obtain


               which  can be rewritten as


               This last equation  is precisely  Eq. (32.6) with p(x)  = e x  , q(x)  = xe x  , and w(x)e"  .

                                            x
         32.18.  Transform  (x + 2)y"  + 4y' + xy + 'ke y  = 0  into  Eq.  (32.6)  by  means  of  the  procedure  outlined  in
               Problem 32.16.
                  Here  a 2(x)  =x + 2 and a^x)  = 4; hence a^la^x)  = 41 (x + 2) and



               Multiplying the  given differential  equation  by I(x),  we  obtain



               which  can be rewritten as
   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337