Page 191 - Probability, Random Variables and Random Processes
P. 191

CHAP.  51                        RANDOM  PROCESSES



                  By definition (2.28),






               Thus,           Cov[X(t), X(s)] = +{Var[X(t)] + var[X(s)]  - Var[X(t) - X(s)l)
               Using Eqs. (3.1 01) and (5.1 02), we obtain

                                             $a12[t + s - (t - s)]  = a12s   t > s
                                    KX(4 s) =
                                             $a12[t + s - (S - t)]  = a12t   s > t
               or
               where aI2 = Var[X(l)].


         5.24.   (a)  Show that a simple random walk X(n) of Prob. 5.2 is a Markov chain.
               (b)  Find its one-step transition probabilities.

               (a)  From Eq. (5.73) (Prob. 5.10), X(n) = {X,, n 2 0) can be expressed as



                  where Z,  (n = 1,2, . . .) are iid r.v.'s  with
                              P(Z,=k)=ak    (   1  -1   and   a,=p    a-,=q=l-p
                  Then X(n) = {X,,  n 2 0) is a Markov chain, since
                               P(X,+l=i,+l~X,=O,Xl=i  ,,..., X,=i,)
                                      = P(Z,+, + in = in+, lXo = 0, X,  = i,, ..., X,  = in)
                                      = P(Z,+l = in+, -in)  = ain+i-in = P(X,+, = in+,  IX,  = in)
                  since Z,+ , is independent of X,,  X,, . . . , X,.
               (b)  The one-step transition probabilities are given by
                                                                     k=j+l
                                    pjk=P(X,=klX,-I  =j)=     1 -p   k=j-1
                                                                     otherwise
                  which do not depend on n. Thus, a simple random walk X(n) is a homogeneous Markov chain.


         5.25.  Show that for a Markov process X(t), the second-order distribution is suficient to characterize

                  Let X(t) be a Markov process with the nth-order distribution


               Then, using the Markov property (5.26), we have





               Applying the above relation repeatedly for lower-order distribution, we can write
   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196