Page 24 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 24

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS






            When pieces of a large multiyear project start falling into place, a sign that it
            functions right is that the pieces “know by themselves” what to do and when to
            do it. A product of one section logically invites and defines the other; theory calls
            for the experiment to confirm its correctness; experiments beg for turning theory
            into useful products. The project then operates as a leisurely human walk: As
            the right foot is thrown forward, the left foot knows it should stay behind on the
            ground, the body bends slightly forward as if ready to fall, the left arm moves
            forward, and the right arm heads back—all at once, seemingly effortlessly, and
            then they switch, one-two, one-two, a pleasure to watch, so hard to emulate,
            one-two, one-two.
              A piece of science or new technology cannot be like this, not that perfect,
            simply because there is always more unknown and yet undiscovered than known
            and understood. But the feeling is similar: All of a sudden, things fall into place.
            This picture fully applies to this book. While the knowledge that it treats will
            be always incomplete, a moment came when individual smaller projects started
            looking as parts of a tightly coordinated organism.
              This would not be possible without my graduate students. Much of today’s
            science is produced this way. It is the graduate students’ sleepless nights, enthu-
            siasm, and unwavering commitment to science that help cover the skeleton of
            ideas with flesh and blood of details of design and proofs and tests and computer
            simulations. They help turn the skeleton’s jerky squeakiness into smooth and
            coordinated and pleasing to the professional eye elegant whole.
              “What if” is rarely a reliable game. There is no way of knowing what this book
            would look like if I had different students, not those I was privileged to have. I do
            think that some pieces would have been quite different, because the personalities
            and prior background of my students invariably left a strong trace on my choice
            of projects for them and hence the joint papers that became the foundation of
            this book. I am grateful to them for sharing with me the joy of doing science.
            With all those different personalities, there was also something in common that
            emerged in them as the work progressed–perhaps the desire for dry precision,
            for doing things right. In thanking them for sharing with me our life in the lab
            and discussions in seminars and at the blackboard, I am mentioning here only
            those whose work was pivotal for this book: Kang Sun, Timothy Skewis, Edward
            Cheung, Susan Hert, Andrei Shkel, Fei Liu, Dugan Um. Other students helped
            as well, but their main work centered on topics that are beyond our subject here.


                                                                           xxiii
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29