Page 26 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 26

CHAPTER 1

            Motion Planning—Introduction





                   Midway along the journey ... I woke to find myself in a dark wood, for I had
                   wandered off from the straight path.
                                            —Dante Alighieri, The Divine Comedy, ‘‘Inferno’’




            1.1 INTRODUCTION

            In a number of Slavic languages the noun “robota” means “work”; its derivative
            “robotnik” means a worker. The equivalent of “I go to robota” is a standard morn-
            ing sentence in many East European homes. When in 1921 the Czech writer Karel
            Capek needed a new noun for his play R.U.R. (Rossum’s Universal Robots),
            which featured a machine that could work like a human, though in a some-
            what mechanical manner, he needed only to follow Slavic grammar: Chopping
            off “a” at the end of “robota” not only produced a new noun with a similar
            meaning but moved it from feminine to masculine. It was just what he wanted
            for his aggressive machines that eventually rebelled against the humankind and
            ran amok. The word robot has stuck far beyond Capek’s wildest expectations—
            while, interestingly, still keeping his original narrow meaning.
              Among the misconceptions that society attaches to different technologies,
            robotics is perhaps the most unlucky one. It is universally believed that a robot
            is almost like a human but not quite, with the extent of “not quite” being the pet
            project of science fiction writers and philosophers alike. The pictures of real-life
            robots in the media, in which they look as close to a human as, say, a refrigerator,
            seem to only insult the public’s insistence on how a robot should look.
              How much of “not quite”-ness is or ever will be there is the subject of some-
            times fierce arguments. It is usually agreed upon that high intelligence is a must
            for a robot, as is a somewhat wooden personality. And, of course, the public
            refuses to take into account the tender age of the robotics field. One standard
            way of expressing the “not quite”-ness is a jerky motion sold as robot motion
            in Hollywood movies and by young people imitating a robot on street corners.
            Whatever future improvements the public is willing to grant the field, a smooth
            motion and a less-than- wooden personality are not among them. A robotics
            Sensing, Intelligence, Motion, by Vladimir J. Lumelsky
            Copyright  2006 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
                                                                              1
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31