Page 289 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 289

264    MOTION PLANNING FOR TWO-DIMENSIONAL ARM MANIPULATORS

                                                    1
           Proof: If this were not so, the component of C containing x would have, by
           Theorem 5.9.4, the single vertex x as its boundary. This is contrary to Theo-
           rem 5.9.3. Q.E.D.

                                              2
                                                   2
                                                          2
           Theorem 5.9.6. [110, V.3.3] For any C , ∂|C |=|∂C |.
                                          2
           It follows from Theorem 5.9.6 that   and 0 are the only 2-cycles. Hence, if ∂C 2
                                 2
                                                 2
                                                      2
           is connected then so is C , because either C =   or else every component of
             2
                                                                  2
                                             2
           C contains a non-null component of ∂C . On the other hand, if C is connected,
                                      2
           it does not necessarily mean ∂C is connected.
                                                                          ∗
              It is sometimes necessary to pass from one grating, G, to another, G ,by
                                                       ∗
           introducing additional lines. Such a new grating G is called a refinement of
           the old. (It is convenient to agree that G is a refinement of itself.) A common
           refinement can be formed for any two gratings G 1 and G 2 , by taking all the lines
           of G 1 and G 2 as cross lines.
                                                                       k
                              k
              To each k-chain, C on G corresponds to the subdivided k-chain C on G ;
                                                                             ∗
                                                                       ∗
             k
                                                        k
           C is the sum of the k-chains into which the k-chain C are subdivided. (0-chains
             ∗
                                      0
                                           0
           are unaltered by subdivision: C = C .) A subdivided chain has the same locus
                                      ∗
                          k
                                k
           as its original: |C |=|C |.
                          ∗
           Theorem 5.9.7. [110, V.4.1]
                                                      k
                                             k
                                 k
                            k
                                                               k
                         (C + C ) ∗ = C k 1∗  + C ,  (∂C ) ∗ = ∂(C )
                                2
                            1
                                             2∗
                                                               ∗
                            k
                                                     k
           Corollary 5.9.1. C is a k-cycle if and only if C is a k-cycle.
                            ∗
                                                       1        k
           Separation Theorems. Let E be an open set of T ,and let   be a k-cycle on
                                                k
                                                                       k
           a grating G defined in E.We say the cycle   bounds in E, denoted as   ∼ 0, if
           there is, on some refinement G of G,a (k + 1)-chain C k+1  such that |C k+1 |⊆ E
                                     ∗
                                                              k
                        k
                                                                         k
                                        k
           and ∂C k+1  =   on G .Wesay   is nonbounding in E if |  |⊆ E but   does
                              ∗
           not bound in E. The notion of bounding can be used to study the connectivity of
                      1
           a subset of T : A simple closed curve (a 1-cycle) bounds if it separates a subset
           from the rest of the space; if two vertices (a 0-cycle) in G do not bound in E,
           then E is not connected.
              By Jordan Curve Theorem [110, V.10.2], a simple closed curve always bounds
           in a plane (a sphere). The following statement indicates this is not necessarily
           true in a torus.
                                                              1
           Theorem 5.9.8. Every 1-cycle on a rectangular grating in T is the boundary of
           either none 2-chain or just two 2-chains.
           Proof: The proof is by induction on the number of lines drawn across the unit
                                1
           square that represents T . On the grating consisting of a and b alone, the only
                                                                            2
           1-cycles are (a) the null sets, which bound two 2-chains (the zero chain and   ),
           and (b) the cycles a, b,and a + b, each of which does not bound (i.e, does not
   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294