Page 375 - Sensing, Intelligence, Motion : How Robots and Humans Move in an Unstructured World
P. 375

350    HUMAN PERFORMANCE IN MOTION PLANNING

                   is done by the underlying software. Both the labyrinth test (Figure 7.1)
                   and the arm test (Figure 7.5) are done in this version.
                 2. In this test, called the physical test, the subject works in the booth,
                   moving the physical arm (Figure 7.10). Only the arm tests, and no
                   labyrinth tests, were done in this version.
              C. Visibility factor, with two levels:
                 1. Visible environment: The object (one of those in factor A) and its envi-
                   ronment are fully visible.
                 2. Invisible environment: Obstacles cannot be seen by the subject, except
                   when the robot (in case of the point robot) or a part of its body (in case
                   of the arm) is close enough to an obstacle, in which case a small part
                   of the obstacle near the contact point becomes visible for the duration
                   of contact. The arm is visible at all times.
              D. Direction factor (for the arm manipulator test only), with two levels:
                 1. “Left-to-right” motion (denoted below LtoR), as in Figure 7.8.
                 2. “Right-to-left” motion (denoted RtoL); in Figure 7.8 this would corre-
                   spond to moving the arm from position T to position S.
              E. Training factor. The goal here is to study the effect of prior learning and
                 practice on human performance. This factor is studied in combination with
                 all prior factors and has two levels:
                 1. Subjects’ performance with no prior training. Here the subjects are only
                   explained the rules and controls, and are given the opportunity to try
                   and get comfortable with the setup, before the actual test starts.
                 2. Subjects’ performance is measured after a substantial prior training and
                   practice.

              Therefore, the focus of Experiment One is on factors B, C, and D, and the
           focus of Experiment Two is on factor E (with the tests based on the same factors
           B, C, and D). Because each factor is a dichotomy with two levels, all possible
           combinations of levels for factors B, C, and D produce eight tasks that each
           subject can be subjected to:
              Task 1: Virtual, visible, left-to-right
              Task 2: Virtual, visible, right-to-left
              Task 3: Virtual, invisible, left-to-right
              Task 4: Virtual, invisible, right-to-left
              Task 5: Physical, visible, left-to-right
              Task 6: Physical, visible, right-to-left
              Task 7: Physical, invisible, left-to-right
              Task 8: Physical, invisible, right-to-left

           In addition to these tasks, a smaller study was carried out to measure the effect
           of three auxiliary variables:
   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380