Page 93 - Shakespeare in the Movie From the Silent Era to Shakespeare in Love
P. 93

82   I  Shakespeare  in  the Movies


        to  once more be at  one with  the  old tavern  crowd. This Henry  still
        possesses  the  common  touch  but  is  removed by  responsibilities of
        office.  In  Olivier's  version,  Henry's  youthful experiences  are barely
        mentioned,  since they were the  momentary  madness  of immaturity
        and  are now  irrelevant.  In Branagh's version,  the  ghosts  of the  past
        haunt  Henry,  which  necessitated  flashbacks  to  the  old days at  Mis-
        tress  Quickly's  tavern.  These  scenes,  lifted  from  Henry  IV,  Part II,
        are  lit  in  the  style  of  Rembrandt,  with  the  richly  colored  past
        absolutely  glowing,  as  opposed to  the  grim  present,  which  is cap-
        tured in unglamorous  natural  lighting.
           Even  as  the  portrait  of kingship  is  decidedly different,  so,  too,  is
        Branagh's reenactment  of Agincourt. Here the  horrific  fighting  takes
        place  in  the  midst  of  a  muddy  field,  under  dark  skies  and  in  a
        somber  atmosphere.  The  emphasis  is  on  the  brutality  of hand-to-
        hand, medieval-style warfare.  This  perfectly  expresses Branagh's late-
        eighties  realistic  sensibility  (he admitted to watching  Oliver  Stone's
        Platoon before  filming),  as compared to  Olivier's  romantic portrayal
        of  combat. Olivier's Agincourt was imbued with  the  "good war" sen-
        sibility  of World War II, while  Branagh reached back to  the  grimness
        of  World  War  I  with  men  squatting  in  the  muck  and  squalor  of
        soaked  slit  trenches,  captured  by  the  camera  in  intimate close-to-
        medium   ranges. In  each  case,  the  director's  technical  choices  com-
        municate  his  point  of view.
           Branagh's  character  derives  his  strength  from  an  absolute  trust
        that  God is  on his  side, implicit  but  not  emphasized  in  the  Olivier
        version.  Henry's  prayer to  the  Lord  (in which  he  humbly  asks for-
        giveness  for Henry IV's transgressions,  pleading that  the  sins  of  the
        father  not  be visited  upon  this  son) is as central to  Branagh's  vision
        as  it  was  peripheral in  Olivier's. If we  do believe  these  English  will
        ultimately  win,  it  can  only  be  because  of  divine  intervention,  for
        their  leader  demonstrates  no  notable  quality  other  than  absolute
        faith.  No  wonder Branagh  had  musical  director  Pat  Doyle  include
        "Non  nobis domine"  ("Not unto  us, O Lord, but unto  thy name give
        glory"),  sung by Henry's  troops, during the postvictory march. Con-
        versely,  the  stirring  orchestral  score  William  Walton  provided for
        Olivier  suggested  that  Henry  won  the  triumph  due to  his  innate
        skills—which,  in  fact,  the  real Henry did.
           Nowhere,  though,  is  the  directorial  difference  between Branagh
        and  Olivier  so  clear  as  in  their  choice  of framing  devices.  Olivier's
        artistic  contrivance is  rightly  one  of the  best-loved moments  in  all
        Shakespearean  cinema,  where  the  camera pans  over  a  detailed re-
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98