Page 84 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 84

Chapter 4.  Perceptions of silence   71


             Table 4.1  Description of the Japanese participants in the interviews (male)

             Male  Age    Degree            Years       Length of residence in Australia
             M1    27     B. of Education   4th         8 years
             M2    24     B. of Arts        3rd         6 years
             M3    20     B. of Industrial Design  2nd  10 years
             M4    22     B. of Industrial Design  3rd  4 years
             M5    22     B. of Arts        2nd         2 years
             M6    20     B. of Chemistry   2nd         7.5 years
             M7    20     B. of Engineering  2nd        5 years
             M8    25     M. of Arts        2nd         1.5 years
             M9    28     M. of Commerce    2nd         2.5 years


             Table 4.2  Description of the Japanese participants in the interviews (female)
             Female Age   Degree            Years       Length of residence in Australia
             F1    23     B. of Arts        2nd         5.5 years
             F2    23     B. of Arts        3rd         6.5 years
             F3    22     B. of Arts        2nd         2.5 years
             F4    29     B. of Arts        2nd         2.5 years
             F5    21     B. of Arts        2nd         3.5 years
             F6    20     B. of Arts        2nd         5 years
             F7    20     B. of Commerce    2nd         4.5 years
             F8    21     B. of Science     1st         2 years
             F9    24     M. of Education   2nd         2 years
             F10   27     M. of Commerce    2nd         1.5 years


             a more passive role. This is because the focus group interview is regarded as
             having the strength of eliciting shared views of the group to which participants
             belong, and these shared views are likely to be expressed more explicitly (Berg
             1998; Sussman et al. 1991). Moreover, it provides an excellent opportunity for the
             researcher to observe how the target group talk about the issues under investiga-
             tion (Agar 1980, 1998; Berg 1998; Saville-Troike 1984; Spradley 1979). Having
             both individual and focus group interview techniques enhanced the degree of
             balance in the data (De Cillia et al. 1999; Espin 1999). Participants in focus group
             interviews are shown in Table 4.3.


             4.1.2  Perceiving others’ silence: Lecturer questionnaire

             In order to compare lecturer perceptions of Japanese students with self-percep-
             tions of Japanese students, a survey was conducted. Email questionnaires were
             sent to 371 lecturers across six faculties at the University of Sydney, of which 34
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89