Page 91 - Silence in Intercultural Communication
P. 91

78   Silence in Intercultural Communication



             the floor for a period of time, while students listen and take notes. It is possible,
             however, to find students interrupting or jumping in to ask questions or make
             comments.
                Among  these  participant  structures,  Japanese  students  did  not  describe
             themselves as silent when they were nominated by the teacher individually (1),
             interacting with the teacher in one-on-one situations (2) or giving a presentation
             (6). Some of the Japanese students said that the only time they spoke is when they
             were nominated by the lecturer:
             (13)   Usually I end up observing. If I am nominated, I say something. [28:97 F4]

             (14)   [...] normally the only time I open my mouth is when she [the lecturer]
                     nominates me and ask ‘What do you think [the student’s name]?’ or ‘How
                     about you?’ [2:140 M1]

             One-on-one private talk was found to be preferred and more frequent than public
             interaction:
             (15)   It’s no problem to talk one-on-one or privately, but I don’t like talking in
                     public. [28:43 F3]

             In the interviews, active participation by Japanese students in small group discus-
             sion (3) was referred to. One of the students even mentioned that she often takes
             a leading role in small group discussions to keep the discussion on track. The ab-
             sence of Japanese students’ participation in whole class discussions (4) contrasts
             with their participation in small group discussions:

             (16)   Well... in group discussion, I talk a lot, but usually, I don’t know, in open, open
                     discussion, what can I say, I am left behind. [30:93 F7]
             These  tendencies  for  participation  reflect  the  Japanese  high  school  classroom
             practices (discussed in Chapter 3) in which students rarely volunteer in public,
             on-the-record contexts but take a relaxed approach to conversing with the teacher
             and peers in unofficial, off-the-record contexts.
                With regard to the discussion after a student’s own presentation, it appears
             that the mode of participation in this participant structure is passive, as implied
             in the following comments:

             (17)   I:      And when people started to talk in these presentations in Asian Studies
                             courses, how do you respond to it as a presenter?
                     F5:    How? Well, I just listen. (giggle) [17:165 F5]
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96