Page 142 -

7 Checking Simulations: Detecting and Avoiding Errors and Artefacts 139

Gilbert, N., & Terna, P. (2000). How to build and use agent-based models in social science. Mind
& Society, 1(1), 57–72.
Gilbert, N., & Troitzsch, K. G. (1999). Simulation for the social scientist. Buckingham: Open
University Press.
Gotts, N. M., Polhill, J. G. & Adam, W. J. (2003, 18–21 September). Simulation and analysis
in agent-based modelling of land use change. Online proceedings of the first conference of
the European Social Simulation Association, Groningen, The Netherlands, http://www.uni-
koblenz.de/~essa/ESSA2003/gotts_polhill_adam-rev.pdf.
Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge
Acquisition, 5(2), 199–220.
Hare, M., & Deadman, P. (2004). Further towards a taxonomy of agent-based simulation models
in environmental management. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 64(1), 25–40.
Hernández, C. (2004). Herbert A. Simon, 1916-2001, y el Futuro de la Ciencia Económica. Revista
Europea De Dirección y Economía De La Empresa, 13(2), 7–23.
Heywood, J. G., Masuda, K., Rautmann, R., & Solonnikov, V. A. (Eds.). (1990). The Navier-Stokes
equations: Theory and numerical methods; Proceedings of a conference held at Oberwolfach,
FRG, Sept. 18–24, 1988. (Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1431). Berlin: Springer.
Holland, J. H., & Miller, J. H. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. American
Economic Review, 81(2), 365–370.
Izquierdo, L. R., & Polhill, J. G. (2006). Is your model susceptible to floating point errors? Journal
of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(4). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/9/4/4.html.
Kleijnen, J. P. C. (1995). Verification and validation of simulation models. European Journal of
Operational Research, 82(1), 145–162.
Kleindorfer, G. B., O’Neill, L., & Ganeshan, R. (1998). Validation in simulation: Various positions
in the philosophy of science. Management Science, 44(8), 1087–1099.
Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. (2003a). Role of dimensionality in Axelrod’s
model for the dissemination of culture. Physica A, 327, 1–5.
Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. (2003b). Global culture: A noise-induced
transition in finite systems. Physical Review E, 67(4), 045101.
Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. (2003c). Nonequilibrium transitions in
complex networks: A model of social interaction. Physical Review E, 67(2), 026120.
Klemm, K., Eguíluz, V., Toral, R., & San Miguel, M. (2005). Globalization, polarization and
cultural drift. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, 29(1–2), 321–334.
Kluver, J., & Stoica, C. (2003). Simulations of group dynamics with different models. Journal of
Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 6(4). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/6/4/8.html.
Leombruni, R., & Richiardi, M. (2005). Why are economists sceptical about agent-based simula-
tions? Physica A, 355, 103–109.
Moss, S. (2001). Game theory: Limitations and an alternative. Journal of Artificial Societies and
Social Simulation, 4(2). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/2.html.
Moss, S. (2002). Agent based modelling for integrated assessment. Integrated Assessment, 3(1),
63–77.
Moss, S., Edmonds, B., & Wallis, S. (1997). Validation and verification of computational models
with multiple cognitive agents (Report no. 97–25). Manchester: Centre for Policy Modelling,
http://cfpm.org/cpmrep25.html.
Ostrom, T. (1988). Computer simulation: The third symbol system. Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology, 24(5), 381–392.
Parunak, H. V. D., Savit, R., & Riolo, R. L. (1998). Agent-based modeling vs. equation-based
modeling: A case study and users’ guide. In J. S. Sichman, R. Conte, & N. Gilbert (Eds.),
Multi-agent systems and agent-based simulation. (Lecture notes in artificial intelligence 1534)
(pp. 10–25). Berlin: Springer.