Page 144 -
P. 144

127



         when we retain the O(1) term only. From (3.39), we find that






          where we have retained the O(1) and  terms (and we have assumed that H possesses
          a suitable Taylor expansion). These two expansions, (3.41) and (3.42), match precisely
          when we select              and then






          We conclude this important example by making a few observations.
            First, the behaviour of the far-field solution,  (3.43), as   recovers the near-
          field solution, and so (to this order, at least) the far-field solution is uniformly valid in
               (although our original expansion,  (3.25),  exhibits a singular behaviour). The
          solution (3.43), as Y increases, can be completely described by the characteristic lines,
          in the form






          along which                    These lines are therefore straight, but not par-
          allel; they first intersect for some  (which  depends on the details of the function
             and then the solution becomes multi-valued in   —which is unacceptable,
          unless we revert to an integral form of equation (3.38) and then admit a discontinuous
          solution. This discontinuity, at a distance   from the surface of the aerofoil, man-
          ifests itself in the physical world as heralding the formation of a shock wave. It should be
          no surprise that the characteristic variable plays a significant rôle in the solution of this
          wave-type (hyperbolic) equation; indeed, the results described here can be obtained by
          seeking asymptotic expansions for these, rather than for the functions themselves (see
          Q3.9). A final point, which embodies an important idea, is to note that the near-field
          solution takes essentially the correct form (to leading order) even for the far-field, in
          the sense  that the  solution   is replaced by         where   is the
          appropriate approximation to the characteristic variable. One way to interpret this is
          to regard        as the correct solution, but that it is in the ‘wrong place’ i.e. it
          is not constant along lines     but rather, along lines


          We have seen, in these two somewhat routine examples, and the similar problems in
          the exercises,  how the simplest type of singular perturbation problem can arise.  The
          other fundamentally different problem  that we  may encounter, just as for ordinary
          differential equations, is where the small parameter multiplies the highest derivative:
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149