Page 26 -
P. 26

9



          we have seen in earlier examples, a suitable rescaling of x is useful. In this case we set
                 and so obtain





          and now, for any X fixed, as   we have





          This is a second, and different, approximation to   valid for xs which are proportional
          to  note  that  on X = 0, (1.25) gives the value   which is the correct boundary value.
            In summary, therefore, we have (from (1.23))




          and (from (1.25))



          These two together constitute an approximation to the exact solution, each valid for an
          appropriate size of x. Further, these two  expressions possess the  comforting property
          that  they describe  a smooth—not discontinuous—transition from one  to the  other,
          in the following  sense.  The approximation  (1.26) is  not  valid for small x, but as x
          decreases we have




          (which we already know is incorrect because   correspondingly, (1.27) is not
          valid for large    but  we see that




          results (1.28) and (1.29) agree precisely. This is clearly demonstrated in figure 1, where
          we have plotted the exact solution for    (as an example) i.e.





          for various  As  decreases, the dramatically different behaviours for x not too small,
          and x small, are very evident.  (Note that the solution for x not too small is
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31