Page 92 - Standards for K-12 Engineering Education
P. 92

Standards for K-12 Engineering Education?

               APPENDIX B                                                                                  77



               issues continually emerged during the analysis of engineering-related documents. Primary
               among these were the social context for engineering, ethics, and interpersonal skills. Although
               these did not meet the criteria for core engineering concepts established for this study,
               engineering activity is clearly grounded in a larger system that reflects values, needs, and
               impacts on societies and cultures. Engineering and technology are inherently social constructs
               (Bijker et al., 1989), and contextual issues must be taken into consideration for core engineering
               concepts to be formulated and understood in a meaningful way.

                       Two additional conceptual distinctions emerged in the analysis. These have to do with the
               nature of problem solving and experimentation. First, problem solving emerged as a substantial
               theme in all five data sets. This makes sense given the fundamental nature of engineering design.
               Activities ranging from the clarification of design parameters relative to (often competing)
               design constraints to problems associated with translating engineering theory into practical
               outcomes all involve solving problems. Thus, on the level of practical implementation, a
               compelling case can be made for including problem solving as a fundamental engineering
               concept. On the conceptual level, however, several other issues emerged. First, when problem
               solving is viewed generically, it extends far beyond engineering and technological activities. For
               example, in the social sciences, problem solving applies to everything from international
               relations to community relations to personal mental health issues (Custer, 1995). In fact, problem
               solving has been classified in three major categories based on Newell and Simon’s (1972) notion
               of problem space. The three problem spaces, defined in terms of activity goals, include
               personal/social, scientific, and technological. Another issue pertinent to engineering is whether
               problem solving represents an overarching concept that subsumes design, invention, and
               troubleshooting (Custer, 1995).
                       Experimentation, like problem solving, emerged as a strong theme throughout the
               analysis. Two issues were raised in discussions about including it as a core engineering concept.
               First, the term “experimentation” is closely identified with science and the scientific method. In a
               scientific context, experimentation connotes a specific methodology for establishing and testing
               hypotheses with the goal of developing a theory. In an engineering context, experimentation has
               more to do generally with incremental trial and error in making a design work (e.g., extending
               human capabilities and meeting needs and wants). Thus, the argument can be made that the term
               experimentation is more appropriately associated with science than with engineering. A related
               issue is the extent to which engineering is considered as science and, as a consequence, whether
               experimentation represents a formal analysis of applications of engineering theory.


                                                  Concluding Comments
                       The purpose of the study described in this paper was to identify a conceptual foundation
               for secondary level engineering education. It should be apparent that this was a daunting task that
               raised a number of associated conceptual and practical issues that have implications for the
               serious consideration of engineering as an integral part of the K–12 curriculum. These issues
               could significantly impact educational policy at the pre-college level where the case remains to
               be made for including engineering content, as well as at the post-secondary level where there are
               increasing calls for reform in engineering education. Areas that warrant further investigation
               include the possible need for K–12 engineering standards, curricula, and teacher pre-service and
               professional development. The central premise of this study is that these issues should be
               addressed after the conceptual foundations have been carefully and thoughtfully developed.








                                        Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97