Page 94 - Standards for K-12 Engineering Education

Standards for K-12 Engineering Education?

APPENDIX B 79

Florman, S. (1996). The introspective engineer. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Goldman, S. L. (1991). The social captivity of engineering. In P. T. Durbin (Ed.), Critical
perspectives on non academic Science and Engineering, Lehigh University Press,
Bethlehem, PA.
Gomez, A. G., Oakes, W. C., & Leone, L. L. (2006). Engineering your future: A project-based
nd
introduction to engineering. 2 ed. Wildwood, MO: Great Lakes Press.
Guskey, T. (2003). What makes professional development effective? Phi Delta Kappan 84, 748-
750.
Harris, K. S., & Rogers, G. E. (2008). Secondary engineering competencies: A Delphi study of
engineering faculty. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 45(1), 5-25.
Hiebert, J., & Lefevre, P. 1986. Conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics: An
introductory analysis. In J. Hiebert (Ed.). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The
case of mathematics (pp. 1-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hill, A. M., & Anning, A. (2001). Primary teachers’ and students’ understanding of school
situated design in Canada and England. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 117-135.
International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2000). Standards for technological
literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA
Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the Method: Conducting the Engineer's Approach to Problem
Solving. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Layton, E. T. (1974). Technology as knowledge. Technology and Culture, 15(1), 31-41.
Lewis, T. (2005). Coming to terms with engineering design as content. Journal of Technology
Education, 16(2), 37-54.
Lewis, T., Petrina, S., & Hill, A. M. (1998). Problem posing: Adding a creative increment to
technological problem solving. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 36(1), 5-35.
Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet,
358, 483-488.
Martin M.W. & Schinzinger R (1996), Ethics in engineering. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Mawson, B. (2003). Beyond ‘The Design Process’: An Alternative pedagogy for technology
education. International Journal of Design Education, 13(2), 117-128.
McCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 7, 141-159.
Meyer, J. H. F. & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to
ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land,
(Eds.). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and
troublesome knowledge (pp. 3-18). London: Routledge Falmer.
Mitcham, C. (1991). Engineering as productive activity: Philosophical remarks. In P. T. Durbin
(Ed.). Critical perspectives on nonacademic science and engineering. Research in
Technology Studies, Vol. 4. London and Toronto: Associated University Press.
Mitcham, C. (1999), Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and
philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
National Academy of Engineering (NAE). (2005). The engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering
education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
NAE and NRC (National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council). (2009)
Engineering in K–12 Education: Understanding the Status and Improving the Prospects.
Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.

Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.