Page 75 - Steam Turbines--Design, Applications, and Rerating by Heinz-Bloch, Murari-Singh
P. 75

56   Chapter Three

            ties usually show up as shaft whip at frequencies less than 50 percent
            of synchronous speed.
              Axial groove bearings have a cylindrical bore with typically two to
            four axial oil feed grooves. These bearings have been very popular in
            relatively low-speed steam turbines. For a given bearing load mag-
            nitude and orientation, the stability characteristics of axial groove
            bearings are controlled primarily by the bearing clearance. Tight
            clearances produce higher instability thresholds but tight clearance
            bearings present other problems that make them undesirable. For
            example, as clearance decreases, the bearing’s operating oil tempera-
            ture increases. Furthermore, babbitt wear during repeated start-ups
            will increase the bearing’s clearance, thereby degrading stability. In
            fact, many bearing-induced instabilities in the field are caused by bear-
            ing clearances that have increased due to wear from oil contamination,
            repeated starts, or slow-rolling with boundary lubrication.
              Because of these limitations, other fixed-bore bearing designs have
            evolved to counteract some of the poor stability characteristics of axial
            groove bearings. Some antiwhirl sleeve bearing examples include pres-
            sure dam bearings, offset half bearings, and multilobe bearings. These
            bearing designs have been successful in increasing the instability
            threshold speed compared to axial groove bearings. The pressure dam
            bearing is probably the most popular with steam turbine designers and
            is still being used today in some lower-speed applications.


            3.1.2 Tilting-pad journal bearings
            Even though they are costlier than fixed-geometry bearings, tilting-
            pad journal bearings have gained popularity with steam turbine
            designers because of their superior stability performance. Unlike fixed-
            geometry bearings, tilt-pad bearings generate very little destabilizing
            cross-coupled stiffness regardless of geometry, speed, load, or operating
            eccentricity. However, turbines supported on tilting-pad bearings are
            still susceptible to instabilities due to other components within the
            machine such as labyrinth seals and/or the turbine blades (steam
            whirl).
              Figure 3.5 is a schematic of a five-pad tilting-pad bearing loaded
            between pivots. Note that the journal center O j is directly below the
            bearing center O b , and the downward load is supported by a vertically
            downward displacement. Because of the pad’s ability to tilt, the atti-
            tude angle is zero and thus the cross-coupling forces are zero. Figure
            3.6 illustrates a typical shaft centerline plot for a tilting-pad bearing
            during a run-up to high speed. The attitude angle is very small and
            thus the cross coupling produced by the bearing is essentially zero.
              Another advantage of tilting-pad bearings is the possibility of many
            variations in design parameters. Some examples include the number of
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80