Page 327 -
P. 327

CHAPTER 9 • STRATEGY REVIEW, EVALUATION, AND CONTROL  293

              reveal what already has happened. For example, rather than simply being informed that
              sales in the last quarter were 20 percent under what was expected, strategists need to
              know that sales in the next quarter may be 20 percent below standard unless some action
              is taken to counter the trend. Really effective control requires accurate forecasting.
                 Failure to make satisfactory progress toward accomplishing long-term or annual
              objectives signals a need for corrective actions. Many factors, such as unreasonable poli-
              cies, unexpected turns in the economy, unreliable suppliers or distributors, or ineffective
              strategies, can result in unsatisfactory progress toward meeting objectives. Problems can
              result from ineffectiveness (not doing the right things) or inefficiency (poorly doing the
              right things).
                 Many variables can and should be included in measuring organizational perfor-
              mance. As indicated in Table 9-4, typically a favorable or unfavorable variance is
              recorded monthly, quarterly, and annually, and resultant actions needed are then
              determined.
                 Determining which objectives are most important in the evaluation of strategies can be
              difficult. Strategy evaluation is based on both quantitative and qualitative criteria.
              Selecting the exact set of criteria for evaluating strategies depends on a particular organiza-
              tion’s size, industry, strategies, and management philosophy. An organization pursuing a
              retrenchment strategy, for example, could have an entirely different set of evaluative crite-
              ria from an organization pursuing a market-development strategy. Quantitative criteria
              commonly used to evaluate strategies are financial ratios, which strategists use to make
              three critical comparisons: (1) comparing the firm’s performance over different time peri-
              ods, (2) comparing the firm’s performance to competitors’, and (3) comparing the firm’s
              performance to industry averages. Some key financial ratios that are particularly useful as
              criteria for strategy evaluation are as follows:
              1.  Return on investment (ROI)
              2.  Return on equity (ROE)
              3.  Profit margin
              4.  Market share
              5.  Debt to equity
              6.  Earnings per share
              7.  Sales growth
              8.  Asset growth



              TABLE 9-4   A Sample Framework for Measuring Organizational Performance
               Factor                 Actual Result        Expected Result       Variance         Action Needed
               Corporate Revenues
               Corporate Profits
               Corporate ROI

               Region 1 Revenues
               Region 1 Profits
               Region 1 ROI
               Region 2 Revenues
               Region 2 Profits
               Region 2 ROI
               Product 1 Revenues
               Product 1 Profits
               Product 1 ROI
               Product 2 Revenues
               Product 2 Profits
               Product 2 ROI
   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332