Page 110 - Strategies and Applications in Quantum Chemistry From Molecular Astrophysics to Molecular Engineer
P. 110

CONVERGENCE OF EXPANSIONS IN A GAUSSIAN BASIS                         95
                         This is  (at variance with C.3) a rapidly converging series for

                         For h suficiently small the first term with l =  1 is a good approximation to the sum
                         (C.5a).

                         If the  upper  integration  limit in  (C.5a) is y = nh rather  than   i.e. for finite n,
                         a simple closed expression is not obtained.  However, one can estimate the leading
                         term in an expansion in powers of   such that








                         The asymptotic  expansion of  (C.5b) in powers of h agrees  with  (C.2). In  fact the
                         first term neglected in  (C.5b)  starts with  In  the  limit  of  course, all
                         terms of an expansion in powers of h vanish.   has an essential  singularity at
                         h = 0.

                         From  this  asymptotic  expansion in  powers of   no  conclusions on the  radius
                         of convergence of    are possible,  but  there are  some  hints that  the radius  of
                         convergence is that of cosech    i.e.the series (A.4) probably converges for






                         This conjecture is consistent  with the result that for   the radius of conver-
                         gence reduces to 0.
                         At        the  arguments  of the exponential functions in  (C.5a) and (C.5b)  agree,
                         which implies that  near       goes through zero. Between h = 0 and
                           is slightly negative and rather well approximated by  (C.2),  while for
                         increases rapidly and soon approaches 1.
                         Near       the  cut-off error






                         and the discretization error have the same order of magnitude,  hence the minimum
                         of           is  also  close  to  The  minimum error therefore goes as




                         The prefactor of the  exponential in  (C.7) is  less  easily  obtained. To  get  it  one
                         has to  solve the transcendental equation       for h and insert  this into
                         Numerically one obtains that this factor is close to  1/2.
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115