Page 131 - Strategies and Applications in Quantum Chemistry From Molecular Astrophysics to Molecular Engineer
P. 131

116                                               J. P. MALRIEU AND J. P. DAUDEY





                             In our opinion it would be better to avoid the HF step, and to start the CI process from any
                             unbiased function, symmetrical for  as are the Huckel MOs. We think that it is risky
                             to study the existence and amplitude of a physical symmetry-breaking phenomenon through
                             a computational sequence involving a symmetry-broken wave function at an intermediate
                             step, since the  use  of  this  function  introduces a  prejudice  and may  result in an
                             overestimation of the geometrical symmetry breaking. In that case the singlet symmetry
                             breaking goes through an overestimation of the pairing of electrons into bonds (bond-
                             centered charge density waves) as previously discussed and this overpairing, evident for
                                 necessarily acts for  constraining the bond alternation. The approximate CI cannot
                             repair the defect of this starting point [51].

                             4. Final  comments

                             Even if symmetry-broken wave functions are difficult to use for higher levels of
                             computation, their physical content is always instructive about the physical trends of the
                             problem under study and they deserve interest. Their appearance and the more physical
                             geometrical symmetry breaking are internally (but not strictly) related. Since they represent
                             catastrophes on the wave function and/or the energy (or energy derivatives) they should be
                             studied with attention and our ultranumericist discipline has not paid enough attention to
                             these critical behaviours. This neglect is perhaps due to some implicit philosophical
                             "continuism", prevailing in a domain where most instruments are based on variational
                             procedures and optimizations. The use of computers and algorithms as black-boxes, and
                             even the systematic plotting of the results through graphic codes using spline interpolations
                             sometimes lead some quantum chemists of high reputation to miss cusps and intriguing
                             features in their results [13,37]. Since qualitative explanations or pictures may be obtained
                             from symmetry-broken wave functions and since funny behaviours are expected around
                             conformational symmetry breaking, these problems should not be considered as
                             teratological. Pictorial explanations and qualitative problems are both necessary to balance
                             the unavoidable and fruitful research of numerical efficiency.

                             References

                             1.    A.W. Overhauser, Phys. Rev. Letters, 4, 415 (1960).
                             2.    D.J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 21, 225 (1960).
                             3.    W.H. Adams, Phys. Rev. 127, 1650 (1962).
                             4.    P.O. Lowdin, Rev. Mod. Physics, 35, 496 (1963).
                             5.    G. Berthier, J. Chim. Phys. 52, 363, (1954).
                             6.    J.A. Pople and R.K. Nesbet, J. Chem. Phys. 22, 57 (1954).
                             7.    H.  Fukutome, Intern. J. Quant. Chem. 20, 95 (1981).
                             8.    C.A. Coulson in “Quantum Theory of Atoms. Molecules and the Solid State",
                                   P.O. Löwdin ed., Acad. Press, N. York (1966) p 601.
                                   T.A. Kaplan and W.H. Kleiner, Phys. Rev. 156, 1 (1967).
                             9.    W. Kutzelnigg, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 23, 272 (1984).
                             10.   R. Prat and G. Delgado Barrio, Phys. Rev. A, 12, 2288 (1975).
                             11.   for a text-book presentation, see A. Szabo and N. Ostlund, "Modern Quantum
                                   Chemistry ", Mc Millam, London (1982) p 221.
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136