Page 109 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 109

STUART HALL, CULTURAL STUDIES AND MARXISM 97

              Of course, ‘civil society’ is no ideal realm of pure freedom. Its micro-
              worlds  include  the  multiplication  of  points  of  power  and  conflict—
              and  thus  exploitation,  oppression  and  marginalisation.  More  and
              more  of  our  everyday  lives  are  caught  up  in  these  forms  of  power,
              and their lines of intersection. Far from there being no resistance to
              the  system,  there  has  been  a  proliferation  of  new  points  of
              antagonism,  new  social  movements  of  resistance  organised  around
              them—and   consequently,  a  generalisation  of  ‘politics’  to  spheres
              which  hitherto  the  Left  assumed  to  be  apolitical:  a  politics  of  the
              family, of health, of food, of sexuality, of the body. What we lack is
              any  overall  map  of  how  these  power  relations  connect  and  of  their
              resistances. Perhaps there isn’t, in that sense, one ‘power game’ at all,
              more a network of strategies and powers and their articulations—and
              thus a politics which is always positional.
                                                           (Hall, 1989b:130)

            The  systematizing  discursive  formations  of  ideology,  with  their  power  to
            constitute individuals as subjects, and the concern with the extent to which
            it is possible to construct some kind of theory of determination have here
            disappeared. There has been a change not only in the theoretical reference
            points  but  in  the  kinds  of  questions  which  are  set  out  as  requiring
            investigation.
              The  novelty  of  the  framework  may,  however,  be  more  apparent  than
            real.  In  an  essay  titled  ‘The  supply  of  demand’,  first  published  in  1960,
            Stuart Hall had written about the corrosive effects of affluence on the older
            patterns of politics and of culture. Much of the essay is borrowed more or
            less directly from Williams and Hoggart, but it is remarkable in the ways in
            which it extends those ideas into a central focus on the impact, which Hall
            very often sees as a positive impact, of the capitalist boom on the everyday
            life experience of the working class:
              Even if working-class prosperity is a mixed affair…it is there: the fact
              has  bitten  deep  into  the  experience  of  working  people….  There  has
              been an absolute rise in living standards for the majority of workers,
              fuller wage-packets, more overtime, a gradual filling out of the home
              with some of the domestic consumer goods which transform it from a
              place of absolute drudgery. For some, the important move out of the
              constricting  environment  of  the  working-class  slum  into  the  more
              open and convenient housing estate or even the new industrial town.
              The  scourge  of  TB  and  diseases  of  undernourishment  no  longer
              haunting whole regions; the Health Service to turn to if the children are
              ill.  Above  all,  the  sense  of  security—a  little  space  at  least  to  turn
              around in.
                                                            (Hall, 1960b:79)
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114