Page 176 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 176

164 LAWRENCE GROSSBERG

            institutions and texts which populate our commimicative environment, and
            the  processes  which  organize  it.  It  is  a  model  posed  against  the  elitism
            which  characterizes  so  much  of  contemporary  scholarly  and  political
            practice,  a  model  committed  to  respecting  human  beings,  their  lives  and
            their possibilities.


                                            II
                     CULTURAL STUDIES AND THE POSTMODERN

            Hall’s  dialectic  involves  the  search  for  a  middle  ground  which  is  never
            merely  a  ‘desired’  synthesis  or  reconciliation  of  contradictions  but  the
            recognition  and  embodiment  of  struggle  at  every  level.  The  tradition  of
            cultural studies associated with the Birmingham School has been shaped by
            an  almost  continuous  series  of  debates  and  challenges  (Hall  1980a;
            Grossberg  1983,  1984).  On  the  one  hand,  it  has  constantly  constituted
            itself  by  a  critical  engagement  with  other  theoretical  positions:  with  the
            humanism  of  the  culturalists  (for  example,  Raymond  Williams  and
            E.P.Thompson), with the structural/functionalism of the structuralists (for
            example,  Althusser),  with  the  anti-humanism  and  textualism  of
            deconstructionists  and  psychoanalytic  discourse  theory  (for  example,
            Screen  and  certain  versions  of  feminist  theory).  In  each  of  these  debates,
            cultural studies has moved onto the terrain in order to both learn and draw
            back  from  the  differences.  In  each  case,  it  has  taken  something  from  the
            other  position,  reshaped  itself,  its  questions  (empirical  as  well  as
            theoretical) and its vocabularies. But it has refused to abandon the terrain
            of marxism and refused to succumb to the increasingly common pessimism
            of  the  left.  On  the  other  hand,  it  has  constituted  itself  by  constantly
            anchoring its theoretical concerns in concrete historical events and political
            struggles.  It  has  opened  itself,  however  reluctantly  at  times,  to  the
            recognition  that  history  constantly  makes  new  demands  upon  us,
            presenting us with new configurations and new questions. One can simplify
            this  history  of  ‘anchoring  points’:  beginning  with  the  New  Left’s  concern
            with issues of imperialism, racism and culture, continuing into questions of
            emerging  forms  of  resistance,  from  ‘the  margins’  (in  the  form  of
            subcultures) and from feminism, and arriving at the rise of the New Right
            and the simultaneous ‘collapse’ of effective left opposition.
              It is within these terms that we must consider the relationship between
                                                  2
            marxist cultural studies and postmodernism.  To speak metaphorically, the
            war of positions between them has only begun and the result will be, not a
            hegemonic  discourse,  but  a  different  theoretical  position  which  has
            negotiated  the  space  between  them  through  an  analysis  of  its  own
            historical  context.  After  all,  both  cultural  studies  and  postmodern  theory
            are concerned with the place of cultural practices in historical formations
            and political struggles. But marxists are often reluctant to acknowledge the
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181