Page 248 - Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies
P. 248

236 STUART HALL

              The  left  should  not  be  afraid  of  this  surprising  return  of  ethnicity.
            Though  ethnicity  continues  to  be,  in  many  places,  a  surprisingly  resilient
            and  powerfully  reactionary  force,  the  new  forms  of  ethnicity  are
            articulated, politically, in a different direction. By ‘ethnicity’ we mean the
            astonishing  return  to  the  political  agenda  of  all  those  points  of
            attachment which give the individual some sense of ‘place’ and position in
            the world, whether these be in relation to particular communities, localities,
            territories,  languages,  religions  or  cultures.  These  days,  black  writers  and
            film-makers  refuse  to  be  restricted  to  only  addressing  black  subjects.  But
            they insist that others recognize that what they have to say comes out of
            particular  histories  and  cultures  and  that  everyone  speaks  from  positions
            within the global distribution of power. Because these positions change and
            alter, there is always an engagement with politics as a ‘war of position’.
              This insistence on ‘positioning’ provides people with co-ordinates, which
            are  specially  important  in  face  of  the  enormous  globalization  and
            transnational  character  of  many  of  the  processes  which  now  shape  their
            lives.  The  New  Times  seem  to  have  gone  ‘global’  and  ‘local’  at  the  same
            moment.  And  the  question  of  ethnicity  reminds  us  that  everybody  comes
            from some place—even if it is only an ‘imagined community’—and needs
            some sense of identification and belonging. A politics which neglects that
            moment of identity and identification—without, of course, thinking of it as
            something  permanent,  fixed  or  essential—is  not  likely  to  be  able  to
            command the New Times.
              Could  there  be  New  Times  without  new  subjects?  Could  the  world  be
            transformed  while  its  subjects  stay  exactly  the  same?  Have  the  forces
            remaking the modern world left the subjects of that process untouched? Is
            change  possible  while  we  remain  untransformed?  It  was  always  unlikely
            and is certainly an untenable proposition now. This is another one of those
            many  ‘fixed  and  fast-frozen  relationships,  venerable  ideas  and  opinions’
            which, as Marx accurately predicted, New Times are quietly melting into
            thin air.


                                      REFERENCES

            Baudrillard, J. (1977) The Mirror of Production, New York: Telos.
            Berman, M. (1983) All That Is Solid Melts into Air, New York: Simon & Schuster.
            Eagleton, T. (1987) ‘Identity’, in L.Appignanensi (ed.) The Real Me: Postmodernism
               and the Question of Identity, London: Institute of Contemporary Arts.
            Gramsci, A. (1971) The Prison Notebooks, London: Lawrence & Wishart.
            Jameson,  F.  (1984)  ‘The  cultural  logic  of  Capital’,  New  Left  Review  146(July/
               August).
   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253