Page 172 - Successful Onboarding
P. 172

Personal Progress and Prospect: Early Career Support • 159


        days, “no one was assigned as the official buddy [of someone else]—there
        was no process or list of responsibilities. Because of this, everyone involved
        thought someone else was taking care of a Buddy’s responsibilities, and
        the new hires suffered.” The firm’s new buddy system, by contrast, pro-
        vides standards as well as training (called the “Buddy School”) for program
        participants. “This ensures a more consistent onboarding experienced for
        all new hires, leading to an accelerated timeframe in which they will be
        fully engaged, productive members of the organization.”
           Another prime opportunity for systematization of early career support
        involves the mentoring programs that many firms currently maintain. Our
        own research affirms how helpful formal mentoring programs are in inte-
        grating new employees by teaching them how to succeed in the current
        position and how to assess and determine an exciting career forward.
           You should remember that a lot of early career support simply involves
        managers taking the time to speak one-on-one with new hires and offer
        helpful advice. Just having regular conversation might be a step forward
        in many firms, and it can be a hugely effective tool for engaging a new
        hire. The opportunity cost of having conversations is small, as opposed to
        the large investment that some firms make in delivering formal perform-
        ance review programs. Conveying one or two helpful hints—a suggestion
        to take a class, or cuing a new hire into a potentially damaging behavior
        quirk—can go a long way. If a firm can find a way to activate all managers
        to observe new hires, think about them, and intervene to help them, both
        the firm and the new hires will benefit.
           A leader in our firm recently participated in a “pulse check” review with
        a subordinate who joined the company at a mid-management level
        nine months earlier. As a formal part of the process, the leader had occasion
        to offer a piece of advice. “You’re doing great in many areas,” he said, “and
        you have my support. Yet your career here might be limited, since other sen-
        ior people in the firm don’t see you, and you haven’t yet demonstrated con-
        tributions to the firm more broadly.” This leader advised the new hire to
        find and take ownership of a project or initiative that, once completed,
        would give him visibility with senior management across practice areas.
        Informing the new hire that Kaiser Associates expects employees to make
        “firm contributions” outside of their client work was a key performance
        value for us. This new hire thought about it and came back a week later
   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177