Page 104 - Sustainability Communication Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoritical Foundations
P. 104
7 Media Theory and Sustainability Communication 87
Without doubt part of a strategy of sustainable communication is providing
opportunities so that a subjective perception and experience can occur that will
favour acceptance of the vision. An appreciation of the problem is closely related to
the degree an individual feels affected by the problem. This involves recognising the
meaning and importance of these opportunities. Communication through new media
can mean expanding one’s own life and world. Communication about the life
chances of future generations involves responsibility for media generations.
Sustainability communication requires then not least an awareness of the socialisa-
tion and learning conditions of future media generations, who are at home in an
increasingly globalised world with digital networks of communication cultures.
References
Bekkhus, N., & Zacchetti, M. (2010). A European approach to media literacy. International
Journal of learning and Media, 1(1). Retrieved July 30, 2010, from http://ijlm.net/news/
european-approach-media-literacy.
Buck, M., Hartlin, F., & Pfau, S. (2010). Randgänge der Mediengeschichte. Wiesbaden: VS.
Carli, D. (2009). Are you prepared to fight for the future of print media, digital media or both?
Retrieved December 7, 2009, from www.sustainablecommunication.org/resources/articles/88-are-
you-prepared-to-fight-for-the-future-of-print-media-digital-media-or-both.
Castells, M. (2008). The new public sphere: global civil society, communication networks, and
global governance. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
616(1), 78–93.
Davidson, C. N. (2009). Blamed for change: historical lessons on youth, labor, and new media
futures. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(3), 11–18.
Ekecrantz, J. (2007). Media and communication studies going global. Nordicom Review, Jubilee
Issue, 169–181.
Enzensberger, H. M. (1988). Das Nullmedium oder Warum alle Klagen über das Fernsehen gegen-
standslos sind. In H. M. Enzensberger (Ed.), Mittelmaß und Wahn Gesammelte Zerstreuungen
(pp. 89–103). Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.
Gauntlett, D. (2007). Media studies 2.0. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from www.theory.org.uk.
Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Institute for Sustainable Communication. Media. Retrieved May 05, 2010, from http://www.
sustainablecommunication.org/media/news.
Käuser, A. (2002). Medienumbrüche. In H. Schanze (Ed.), Metzler Lexikon (pp. 255–257).
Stuttgart: Metzler.
Kloock, D. (2003). Klassiker der Medientheorie. Duisburg: Studienbrief für das Online-
Studienprogramm Educational Media.
Leschke, R. (2007). Mediale Formen zwischen Intermedialität und Vernetzung. Retrieved
December 7, 2009, from http://www.medienmorphologie.uni-siegen.de/downloads/leschke_
intermedialitaet.pdf.
Leschke, R. (2010). Medien und Formen (Eine Morphologie der Medien). Konstanz: UVK.
Leverette, M. (2003). Toward an ecology of understanding: Semiotics, medium theory, and the
uses of meaning. In Image & Narrative, Issue 6. Medium theory, January 2003. Retrieved May
05, 2010, from http://www.imageandnarrative.be/mediumtheory/marcleverette.htm.
Lovink, G. (2007). Ich blogge, also bin ich. Immer mehr Menschen produzieren sich im Internet.
Wir treten ein in die Epoche des ‚digitalen Nihilismus‘. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from
http://www.zeit.de/2007/52/Interview-Geert-Lovink.