Page 66 - Sustainability Communication Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Theoritical Foundations

4 Sustainable Communication as an Inter- and Transdisciplinary Discipline 49

form or a mixture of forms of European culture, so too must scientists learn that
there are other disciplinary cultures and that they can provide an alternative perspective.
“Changing one’s perspective is like entering another culture” (Frank et al. 1992: 235).

References

Aboelela, S. W., Larson, E., Bakken, S., Carrasquillo, O., Formicola, A., Glied, S. A., Haas, J., &
Gebbie, K. M. (2007). Defining interdisciplinary research: Conclusions from a critical review
of the literature. Health Service Research, 42(1), 329–346.
Anbar, M. (1973). The bridge scientist and his role. Research Development, 24, 30–34.
Aram, J. D. (2004). Concepts of interdisciplinarity: Configurations of knowledge and action.
Human Relations, 57(4), 379–412.
Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation,
coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Asch, S. E. (1987). Social psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines.
Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Brodbeck, F. C., & Frey, D. (1999). Gruppenprozesse. In C. G. Hoyos & D. Frey (Eds.),
Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie. Ein Lehrbuch (pp. 358–372). Weinheim: Beltz.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Derry, S., Schunn, C., & Gernsbacher, M. (2005). Interdisciplinary collaboration: An emerging
cognitive science. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Edmonson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative
Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Frank, A., Schülert, J., & Nicolas, H. (1992). Interdisciplinary learning as social learning and
general education. European Journal of Education, 27(3), 223.
Gebert, D. (2004). Innovation durch Teamarbeit. Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Stuttgart:
Kohlhammer.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzmann, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new
production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies.
London: Sage.
Glock, H. J. (1996). A Wittgenstein dictionary (The Blackwell philosopher dictionaries). Oxford,
UK: Blackwell Reference.
Godemann, J. (2006). Promotion of interdisciplinary competence as a challenge for higher education.
Journal of Social Science Education, 5(2), 51–61. Retrieved July 30, 2010, from www.jsse.
org/2006-2/pdf/godemann_promotion.pdf.
Godemann, J. (2008). Knowledge integration: A key challenge for transdisciplinary cooperation.
Environmental Education Research, 14(6), 625–641.
Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the
hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information
in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 322–339.
Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hoffmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D.,
Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research.
Dordrecht: Springer.
Hollingshead, A. B. (2000). Perceptions of expertise and transactive memory in work relationships.
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 3(3), 257–267.
Jantsch, E. (1972). Towards interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in education and innovation.
In L. Apostel (Ed.), Interdisciplinarity: Problems of teaching and research in universities
(pp. 97–121). Paris: OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.