Page 58 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook
P. 58

Cross-Disciplinary Scientific Foundation for Sustainability Chapter j 3  35


             qualitative data are combined with quantitative economics, a comprehensive
             science emerges as based on a qualitative perspective.
                To get the debate focused, the Lifeworld tradition will be applied initially
             herein to business economics. And to add some perspective, purpose, and
             planning to it, the focus will be primarily upon the business of energy. This
             particular perspective reflects one of the authors’ area of expertise and recent
             experiences and also a very contemporary issue that merges both economics
             and sciencedenergy is viewed as science and engineering. Moreover, the
             business economics of the energy sector is placed in the context of global
             warming and climate change.
                We will discuss how to understand the very concept of organizations and
             how organizations are constructed and developed. We need to have an un-
             derstanding of what people are and what they bring to the organizational
             economic context by interacting with one another and in groups.
                We will also discuss how to understand organizations from a methodo-
             logical viewpoint. It is no mere coincidence that qualitative methods have been
             developed within a Lifeworld tradition. Furthermore, we will show how to
             understand this subjective and scientific paradigm along with the theorizing
             within this tradition that transforms economics into a science along the lines of
             natural and physical sciences. The aim is thereforedthrough the everyday life
             sociological traditiondto discuss the central issues and basic concepts put
             forth by Herbert Blumer’s symbolic interactionism, phenomenology, and
             Chomsky’s linguistics to understand and develop a qualitative economic
             perspective.
                Today there are many insightful criticisms of the objectivist paradigm or as
             it is better known, neoclassical economics, which is the mainstream theory in
             economics. We believe, however, that most of these critiques fall within the
             same philosophical tradition or objectivist paradigm of economics and hence
             are really “revisionist.” An excellent example that has gained considerable
             attention is “Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of
             Everything” (Levitt and Dubner, 2005). In the book and several lectures, the
             authors present qualitative insights but in quantitative methods. In short, they
             rework neoclassical economics around qualitative ideas. Although this is a
             start at being scientific, it lacks explanation and prediction hypotheses must be
             made, tested, and then retested with the purpose of seeking understanding.
                This chapter presents an entirely different route to understanding economic
             and business phenomena. As Erik Reinert, the economic historian, put it there
             are three significant issues in addressing economic theory:

               One: how economic growth is ‘created’; two, the alternative mechanisms
               through which growth and welfare are ‘diffused’ between and within the nation-
               states, and to the individual; and three, how this alternative understanding is
               based on a different philosophical basis.
                                                             Reinert (1997, p. 9).
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63