Page 591 - Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook
P. 591

558  Sustainable Cities and Communities Design Handbook


                                   2
            UCI’s Smart Labs Initiative, a proven program of safely reducing energy use
            in research laboratories by as much as 60%. The US Department of Energy
                                                   3
            (DOE) modeled its Smart Labs Accelerator after UCI’s comprehensive
            program, which is the basis of the campus’ partnership in the DOE’s Better
            Buildings Challenge. 4
               So, what defines a “smart lab”? Essentially, there are seven components,
            each of which needs to be addressed to attain the level of energy savings
            realized by UCI:
             1. Fundamental platform of dynamic, digital control systems
             2. Demand-based ventilation
             3. Low power density, demand-based lighting
             4. Exhaust fan discharge velocity optimization
             5. Pressure drop optimization
             6. Fume hood flow optimization
             7. Commissioning with automated cross-platform fault detection
               UCI began to seriously focus on energy savings in the early 1990s when it
            adopted a policy to outperform California’s already stringent Title 24 Energy
            Code by 30% in new construction. By 2008, UCI’s energy management team
            began to suspect that building energy systems had waste designed in, and by
            more than a few percent! The entrenched professional culture of overdesigning
            “margins of safety” and over-relying on what were then considered best
            practices appeared to be the cause of significant energy waste. Estimates of the
            potential for energy savings in this environment were understandably low and
            suppressed even further by the fact that early rollouts of “smart” buildings had
            been underdeveloped and oversold.
               With a belief that energy savings of as much as 50% might be possible,
            UCI embarked on an overall program of redesigning laboratory building en-
            ergy systems. A number of factors contributed to this pursuit, including the
            realization that buildings’ energy systems had been, to that point, designed to
            waste more energy than realized for a variety of reasons: older, nondynamic
            systems operated at fixed volumes/levels/speeds and “worst case” parameters.
            Before digital controls and sensors, a margin of safety was needed. The energy
            needed to pump water and air is nonlinear, and reheating is excessive when air
            changes are high.
               By focusing holistically on building energy system design (in retrofits and
            new construction), UCI concluded that the key to a “smart” building is to
            provide (1) just the right amount of energy, (2) at just the right place, (3) at just
            the right time. By challenging all accepted design practices and using a


            2. https://www.ehs.uci.edu/programs/energy/UCISmartLabsInitiative_Feb222016.pdf.
            3. https://energy.gov/eere/femp/smart-labs-accelerator.
            4. https://betterbuildingssolutioncenter.energy.gov/showcase-projects/smart-labs-initiativenatural-
               sciences-ii.
   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   596