Page 133 - Sustainable On-Site CHP Systems Design, Construction, and Operations
P. 133

Carbon Footprint—Envir onmental Benefits and Emission Contr ols       111


                         Rich burn    Lean burn


                                        NO x

                           Volume (ppm)   Stoichiometric






                                             CO
                                                        NMHC

                            0.88  1.00  1.13  1.25  1.38  1.50  1.63  1.75
                                          Relative air-fuel ratio (λ)

             FIGURE 7-1  Effect of air-fuel ratio on emissions of natural gas–fi red engine.

                                         4
                According to the 2007 study  by McKinsey & Company on reducing U.S. GHG
             emissions shows, CHP not only helps reduce GHG emissions, it achieves these reduc-
             tions with economic advantages over many other environment friendly technologies
             (see Fig. 7-1). It shows that CHP can deliver CO  reductions at a negative marginal cost
                                                     2
             for both the commercial and industrial sectors. This means that investing in CHP gener-
             ates positive economic return over the technology’s life cycle.
                Lower emissions of carbon dioxide, that is, smaller carbon footprint, for power pro-
             duction by CHP system, may also contribute to the economic incentive for implementing
             CHP. Governments around the world are at various stages of limiting the emissions of
             CO  by providing economic incentives for the reduction of this GHG. One of the incen-
                2
             tives is to allow commercial trading of CO emissions. Trading of CO emissions allows a
                                                2                     2
             company that implements a new technology for reducing the emissions of CO  to sell the
                                                                             2
             CO  reductions achieved by the new technology to another company that is required to
                2
             reduce emissions of CO but cannot yet implement a new technology for doing so.
                                 2
                Carbon emissions’ trading has been steadily increasing in recent years. According
             to information attributed to the World Bank’s Carbon Finance Unit, approximately
             374 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (mtCO e) were exchanged through
                                                               2
                                                                      5
             projects in 2005, a 240 percent increase relative to 2004 (110 mtCO e)  which was itself a
                                                                    2
                                                       6
             41 percent increase relative to 2003 (78 mtCO e).  According to the World Bank esti-
                                                    2
             mates the size of the carbon market was U.S. $11 billion in 2005, U.S. $30 billion in 2006,
             and U.S. $64 billion in 2007. 7
        Environmental Emissions from CHP
             Emissions of CO , NO , and SO  from CHP systems depend primarily on three factors:
                           2    x      x
                  1.  Fuel type and quality
                  2.  Power generation technology
                  3.  Emission control technology used for the prime mover deployed for power
                    generation
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138