Page 302 - Sustainable On-Site CHP Systems Design, Construction, and Operations
P. 302

Sustaining Operational Ef ficiency of a CHP System     275


                The fuel utilization efficiency (η  ),  can be defined as
                                           F
                                             ⎛           ⎞
                                             ⎜ W elec  + ∑ Q th, j⎟
                                         η =  ⎝     j    ⎠                       (17-1)
                                          F      Q
                                                   Fuel
             a metric for overall CHP system performance. Here, W   is the net electrical power
                                                             elec
             output, Q  represents the net rate of useful thermal energy output from heat recovery
                     th,j
             process j with the sum being over all thermal recovery processes in the system, and
             Q    is the total rate of input of fuel energy to the CHP system. This is the most com-
               Fuel
             monly used indicator of CHP system efficiency, although as noted in Katipamula and
             Brambley (2006), it fails to account for the quality (exergy) of the different energy
             streams. Equation (17-1) is specialized to a specific CHP system configuration later in
             this chapter. To account for the quality of the various energy streams, we also use the
             value-weighted energy utilization factor (EUF  ), which is discussed in more detail
                                                     VW
             later in this chapter and in Katipamula and Brambley (2006).
                The generic components of CHP systems include combustion turbines, microtur-
             bines, or reciprocating engines as prime movers; electric generators; heat recovery units
             (which are heat exchangers); steam turbine–driven centrifugal chillers or absorption
             chillers (which convert waste heat from the prime mover to useful chilled water for
             cooling); supplemental electric-drive vapor compression chillers to help meet cooling
             loads during times when the thermal-powered chiller cannot or does not meet the entire
             load; ∗  cooling towers; desiccant systems for dehumidifying air; and pumps for moving
             liquid and fans for moving air.


        Commissioning Verification
             Commissioning verification (CxV) is a process by which the actual performance of the
             individual components in a CHP system and the performance of the CHP system as a
             whole are verified to comply with the designers’ and manufacturers’ specified per-
             formance. Furthermore, for new systems, commissioning should include a systematic
             series of activities, starting in the planning phase and continuing through design, instal-
             lation, and start-up, aimed at ensuring that the owner’s project requirements are met
             and the CHP system operates correctly. Before start-up, the process should include
             inspection and testing of all components in the CHP system to ensure proper compo-
             nents are installed, they are installed correctly, and they perform properly.
                Another goal of this chapter is to provide the reader with algorithms that can be used
             to automate parts of the process for verifying that commissioning has been done correctly
             and resulted in a CHP system that meets design and operational expectations. Although
             CxV can include active testing of components and subsystems, this chapter focuses on veri-
             fying performance to ensure that the system has been adequately commissioned and to
             provide indicators of commissioning still needed when deficiencies are found.


             ∗ Vapor compression chillers used for this purpose often are not considered part of the CHP system, but
             because use of thermally powered chilling must be optimized as part of a larger system that includes
             vapor compression chilling, they must be included in decisions made by the supervisory controller
             regarding how much thermally powered chilling and how much vapor compression chilling to use to
             meet the total cooling load.
   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307