Page 162 - Harnessing the Management Secrets of Disney in Your Company
P. 162

Dare to Dare                       143

          are often viewed by employees throughout corporate America as a “flavor
          of the month”; therefore, he dared to integrate “People First” as a cultural
          philosophy, not as a program initiative. In order to accomplish this, Jim
          continued to meet with thousands of employees in small groups to solicit
          candid feedback and address their concerns. The big question that came
          out of this road trip was, “How do you go about changing the behaviors of
          senior managers and partners in order to achieve a ‘People First’ culture?”
             After “People First” was launched in 2001, Fortune magazine invited
          Jim to participate in a conference panel discussion to present Ernst &
          Young’s “people strategies.” This was the very first time the philosophy
          was discussed publicly. Jim recalled, “I began to sweat. All of a sudden it
          hit me. I was going to tell 100–150 CEOs, half of whom were our clients,
          that our people are more important to us than they are.” Jim’s daring was
          rewarded when nearly all of the CEOs in the room told him that “People
          First” was indeed a smart move. Jim made a sure bet that his team of
          highly motivated and highly satisfied professionals would result in the
          very best service to clients.
             Yet a mammoth challenge lay ahead: how to abandon the “old-school”
          philosophy. There is the traditional, “I’m partner, you’re the grunt mental-
          ity,” Phil Laskawy explained. “It’s the 80–20 rule or maybe the 60–20–20
          rule. Sixty percent are going to accept it, 20 percent are going to leave,
          and 20 percent are going to resist the philosophy. Hopefully that last 20
          percent keeps getting lower and lower.”
             From the massive amount of employee feedback Jim gathered, it was
          clear that some leadership behaviors desperately needed changing. As a
          prescriptive measure, the human resources team created “People Point.” In
          this anonymous rating system, every employee in North America receives
          a request via e-mail to answer one question as it applies to a specific PPD
          (principals, partners, and directors): “How effective is this individual at
          creating an environment of mutual respect and encouraging personal
          growth?” A non-numerical scale allows employees to rank the individual
          on a scale from “Not,” to “Extremely.”
             The “People Point” review system is completely voluntary. Reviewers
          are encouraged to evaluate as many or as few PPDs as they wish. Reviewers
          are also afforded the opportunity to submit additional comments as they
          deem appropriate. At the onset of “People Point,” Jim Freer, vice chairman
          of human resources, said management speculated that they would receive
                                                                 (Continued)
   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167