Page 180 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 180

The Knowledge Worker and the Knowledge Society [  161

                          This is true whether the knowledge worker commands ad-
                       vanced knowledge, like the surgeon, or simple and fairly elemen-
                       tary knowledge like the junior accountant. In either case, it is the
                       knowledge investment that determines whether the employee is
                       productive—not the tools, machines, and capital the organiza-
                       tion furnishes.
                          The industrial worker needed the capitalist infinitely more
                       than the capitalist needed the industrial worker—the basis for
                       Marx’s assertion that there would always be a surplus of indus-
                       trial workers, an industrial reserve army that would make sure
                       wages could not possibly rise above the subsistence level (prob-
                       ably Marx’s most egregious error). In the knowledge society
                       the most probable assumption, and certainly the assumption on
                       which all organizations have to conduct their affairs, is that they
                       need the knowledge worker far more than the knowledge worker
                       needs them. It is the organization’s job to market its knowledge
                       jobs so as to obtain knowledge workers in adequate quantity and
                       superior quality. The relationship increasingly is one of inter-
                       dependence, with the knowledge worker having to learn what
                       the organization needs, but with the organization also having to
                       learn what the knowledge workers needs, requires, and expects.
                          Because its work is based on knowledge, the knowledge or-
                       ganization is altogether not one of superiors and subordinates.
                       The prototype is the symphony orchestra. The first violin may
                       be the most important instrument in the orchestra. But the first
                       violinist is not the superior of the harp player. He is a colleague.
                       The harp part is the harp player’s part, and not delegated to her
                       by either the conductor or the first violinist.
                          There was endless debate in the Middle Ages about the hier-
                       archy of knowledges, with philosophy claiming to be the queen
                       of knowledges. We long ago gave up that moot argument. There
                       is no higher knowledge and no lower knowledge. When the pa-
                       tient’s complaint is an ingrown toenail, the podiatrist’s knowledge
   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185