Page 189 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 189

170 [   The Drucker Lectures

                       one-fifth of the American electorate that voted for Mr. Perot
                       made it very clear that they did not greatly care what part of
                       the government would be downsized, as long as the government
                       would be downsized, as long as the deficit would be cut—and
                       without additional taxes. The danger here is very great that gov-
                       ernment will be exposed to something very similar to what has
                       happened in a lot of big companies. I call it “amputation without
                       diagnosis.” In a lot of big companies, there has been wide slash-
                       ing without any clear idea of what to slash, why to slash, and
                       what to keep. The results have been very unsatisfactory. In big
                       company after big company, you have an announcement in one
                       year that the company would lay off 12,000 people—and a year
                       later comes the second announcement that it will lay off another
                       12,000 people without any improvement in results.
                          Unless the federal government really starts to reinvent gov-
                       ernment, we face downsizing for the sake of downsizing—that
                       is, slashing and cutting for the sake of the numbers rather than
                       to restore government to function, to strength, to performance.
                       What is needed for the next phase—and I don’t think we can
                       afford to wait very long—is to ask the basic questions: What
                       is the function of this agency? If we were not doing this today,
                       knowing what we now know, would we go into it? Is the mission
                       of this agency or of any of its programs still vital? And if it is,
                       how should or could it best be carried out?
                          Do not start out with what should be abandoned. Start out
                       by thinking through what should be strengthened and built. Do
                       not start out by trying to save money. Start out by trying to build
                       performance. I do not know how much time we have. But unless
                       we at least demonstrate that this is the way government is go-
                       ing, we will, I am afraid, inescapably be subjected to amputation
                       without diagnosis.
                          There are the beginnings of doing the right thing. The De-
                       partment of Agriculture, quite clearly, is asking basic questions
   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194