Page 77 - The Drucker Lectures
P. 77

58 [   The Drucker Lectures

                       organ, “the mind,” divorced from, indeed opposed to, “the body”
                       or “the emotions.” “Learning,” the schools assume, is a separate
                       activity, divorced from, indeed opposed to, “doing.” At best, it is
                       a preparation for “doing.”
                          In the Socratic tradition, “learning” had nothing at all to
                       do with “doing”; to connect the two was a vulgar debasing of
                       “learning” and the destruction of “knowledge.” And “learning,”
                       because it was “preparation,” was for the young. The stage in
                       the life cycle in which the human being was deemed sufficiently
                       mature to have attained “rational understanding” but not mature
                       enough to be able to do productive work was the time for “learn-
                       ing.” And one stopped learning as soon as one began “doing.”
                          Today we know that learning is a continuing biological pro-
                       cess. It begins at conception and ends only at death. And there
                       is no difference at all in the way the infant learns or the adult
                       learns. There is only one learning process.
                          We further know that “learning” is not an activity of one
                       specific “learning organ”—the mind or the intellect. It is a pro-
                       cess in which the whole person is engaged—the hand, the eye,
                       the nervous system, the brain. It is indeed the specific process
                       of living beings, from the most primitive to the highest forms.
                       There is a beginning to life and an end to life. But there is no
                       beginning to learning and no end to learning, though there are
                       sequences to it.
                          And so “school” as the institution in which one “learns”—
                       while every place else one “does,” whether in “play” or in “work”—
                       is becoming untenable. The baby’s crib is equally a “learning in-
                       stitution,” as is the job or a severe illness. School not only has to
                       adapt to itself the little we know about how human beings learn,
                       it has to change its image of itself as something apart and quite
                       unrelated to the rest of personality and life to something that
                       organizes, heightens, and affirms a central and existential fact of
                       total human life experience. It will have to restructure itself to be
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82