Page 197 - The extraordinary leader
P. 197

174 • The Extraordinary Leader


        influence others effectively, communicate the things that they know, and
        build collaborative, trusting relationships with others.


        The Link Between Having High Standards and
        Technical Competence
        Similarly, having high standards of excellence does not make people smarter,
        but if you apply the logic of the Rosenberg et al. research presented in Chap-
        ter 4, a good explanation emerges. Recall that the research showed that the
        following adjectives were clustered together in people’s minds:


           ● Scientific
           ● Persistent
           ● Skillful
           ● Imaginative
           ● Intelligent

           We submit, then, that in most people’s perceptions, the qualities of tech-
        nical competence (scientific and intelligent) and high standards of excellence
        (persistence and skillful) are also linked together. If I see you display one,
        I assume you have the other.
           Therefore, by championing extremely high standards for every activity,
        I have subtly caused others to have an elevated view of my technical compe-
        tence. Certainly, on the flip side, a person with minimal technical compe-
        tence would never impose lofty standards of excellence on a team or on
        colleagues. Similarly, the leader who remarks, “Oh, I don’t care if we finish
        on time,” or “Let’s not bust our tails on this project,” is not a person we assume
        has great technical credentials or ability.



        What Are Competency Companions?

        Competency companions (or behavioral buddies) are simply best friends.
        They tend to go everywhere together. When people are effective at one of the
        16 key differentiating behaviors, they tend to do the companion behaviors
        equally well. Conversely, when people are ineffective at a differentiating
        behavior, they tend to perform the companion behaviors poorly. Again, we
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202