Page 148 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 148

134   I n t e g r a t e d   P l a n n i n g                                       B e n c h m a r k i n g    135


                                      underestimate the time, cost, and effort required to successfully
                                      complete a benchmarking project. Managers should be informed
                                      that, while it’s impossible to know the exact time it will take for a
                                      typical benchmark ing project, a rule of thumb is that a team of four
                                      or five individuals requires a third of their time for 5 months to
                                      complete a project.
                                    •  Focusing  on  metrics  rather  than  processes.  Some  firms  focus  their
                                      benchmarking efforts on performance targets (metrics) rather than
                                      processes. Knowing that a competitor has a higher return on assets
                                      doesn’t mean that its performance alone should become the new
                                      target (unless an understanding exists about how the competitor
                                      differs  in  the  use  of  its  assets  and  an  evaluation  of  its  process
                                      reveals that it can be emulated or surpassed).
                                    •  Not positioning benchmarking within a larger strategy. Benchmarking
                                      is one of many total quality management tools—such as problem
                                      solving, process improvement, and process re-engineering—used
                                      to  shorten  cycle  time,  reduce  costs,  and  minimize  variation.
                                      Benchmarking  is  compatible  with  and  complementary  to  these
                                      tools, and they should be used together for maximum value.
                                    •  Misunderstanding the organization’s mission, goals, and objectives. All
                                      benchmarking activity should be launched by management as part
                                      of  an  overall  strategy  to  fulfill  the  organization’s  mission  and
                                      vision  by  first  attaining  the  short-term  objectives  and  then  the
                                      long-term goals.
                                    •  Assuming every project requires a site visit. Sufficient information is
                                      often  available  from  the  public  domain,  making  a  site  visit
                                      unnecessary.  This  speeds  the  benchmarking  process  and  lowers
                                      the cost considerably.
                                    •  Failure to monitor progress. Once benchmarking has been completed
                                      for a specific area or process benchmarks have been established
                                      and process changes imple mented, managers should review progress
                                      in implementation and results.

                                   The best way of addressing these issues is to prevent their occurrence
                                through  carefully  planning  and  managing  the  project  from  the  outset.
                                This list can be used as a checklist to evaluate project plans; if the plans
                                don’t clearly preclude these problems, then the plans are not complete.


















          07_Pyzdek_Ch07_p129-136.indd   135                                                            11/9/12   5:10 PM
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153