Page 158 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 158

144   I n t e g r a t e d   P l a n n i n g                         O r g a n i z a t i o n a l   A s s e s s m e n t    145








                                             Cost per good unit of product  Failure  quality costs



                                                                           Total




                                                                   costs



                                                        Costs of appraisal
                                                         plus prevention
                                              0                                      100
                                                         Quality of conformance, %
                                Figure 8.4  New model of optimum quality costs (Juran, 1988, by permission).


                                   Quality costs are lowered by identifying the root causes of quality
                                problems  and  taking  action  to  eliminate  these  causes.  The  tools  and
                                techniques described in Chap. 5 are useful in this endeavor. KAIZEN,
                                reengineering, and other continuous improvement approaches are com­
                                monly used.
                                   As a general rule, quality costs increase as the detection point moves
                                further up the production and distribution chain. The lowest cost is gener­
                                ally obtained when nonconformances are prevented in the first place. If
                                nonconformances occur, it is generally least expensive to detect them as
                                soon  as possible  after their occurrence. Beyond that point there is loss
                                incurred from additional work that may be lost. The most expensive quality
                                costs are from nonconformances detected by customers. In addition to the
                                replacement or repair loss, a company loses customer goodwill and repu­
                                tation. In extreme cases, litigation may result, adding even more cost and
                                loss of goodwill.
                                   Another advantage of early detection is that it provides more mean­
                                ingful feedback to help identify root causes. The time lag between produc­
                                tion and field failure makes it very difficult to trace the occurrence back to
                                the process state that produced it. While field failure tracking is useful in
                                prospectively evaluating a “fix,” it is usually of little value in retrospectively
                                evaluating a problem.
                                   The accounting department bears primary responsibility for account­
                                ing matters, including cost of quality systems. The quality department’s








          08_Pyzdek_Ch08_p137-150.indd   145                                                            11/9/12   5:10 PM
   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163