Page 263 - The Handbook for Quality Management a Complete Guide to Operational Excellence
P. 263

250    C o n t i n u o u s   I m p r o v e m e n t                                                                                                              e f f e c t i v e   C h a n g e   M a n a g e m e n t    251


                                    •  People  may  be  apprehensive  or  even  fearful  of  change.  Organizational
                                      change requires that we adopt new policies or procedures, which can
                                      be unsettling to some members of the organization. There is security
                                      in the status quo, and fear of the unknown is a barrier to change.
                                    •  It is natural, perhaps even productive, to be skeptical of change. Change
                                      is not always for the better, at least in everyone’s eyes, and even
                                      marginal improvements in some areas may require accommoda-
                                      tion in others. Even when there is general acknowledgment that
                                      change could result in improvement, there may be skepticism that
                                      the improvement will be attained.

                                   Forsha  (1992)  pro vides  the  process  for  personal  change  shown  in
                                Fig. 12.2.
                                   The  adjustment  path  results  in  preservation  of  the  status  quo.  The
                                action path results in change. The well-known PDCA cycle can be used
                                once a commitment to action has been made by the individual. The goal
                                of such change is continuous self-improvement.
                                   Within an organizational context, the individual’s reference group plays
                                a part in personal resistance to change. A reference group is the aggregation
                                of people a person thinks of when he or she uses the word “we.” If “we”
                                refers to the company, then the company is the individual’s reference group
                                and he or she feels connected to the company’s success or failure. However,
                                “we” might refer to the individual’s profession or trade group, for example,
                                “We  doctors,”  “We  engineers,”  “We  union  members.”  In  this  case  the
                                leaders shown on the formal organization chart will have little influence
                                on the individual’s attitude toward the success or failure of the project.
                                When a project involves external reference groups with competing agendas,
                                the task of building buy-in and consensus is daunting indeed.



                                                                Denial


                                                                Anger


                                                              Negotiation



                                                   Depression             Decision


                                                  Acceptance               Action
                                                 Adjustment path         Action path
                                Figure 12.2  The process of personal change.








          12_Pyzdek_Ch12_p241-264.indd   250                                                            11/9/12   5:13 PM
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268