Page 281 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 281

Public Support for Regulating the Public                           257

               actions a coalition should take to gain media attention. Broadly, the litera-
               ture suggests that to be effective, the coalition should cultivate relation-
               ships with members of the media, create news, and present its message
               with an audience-attracting “hook.” News can be created by staging events,
               reporting survey results, conducting tours, creating links with highly tra-
               ditional newsworthy events, and so on. Hooks include such “tricks” as
               linking the story to a celebrity, having a personal or local angle, using an
               anniversary or milestone, using great visuals, and so forth. (See Wallack,
               et al., 1993, and Siegel & Lotenberg, 2007, for an extended discussion of
               effective strategies and tactics.) In summary, case histories strongly sup-
               port the idea that Link “b” (see Figure 9.1) exists if the coalition uses effec-
               tive strategies and tactics.


                  The Direct Consequences of Media Attention

                  A potential objective of media advocacy is to directly influence policy
               makers (Figure 9.1, Link “c”). There are numerous case studies in which
               successful efforts to gain media coverage also resulted in positive policy
               changes (Wallack et al., 1993). The consistent pattern is that legislators
               and potential coalition members do pay attention to the media. In addi-
               tion, studies in the mass communication literature use aggregate data (e.g.,
               Gallup polls) to test the level of association between measures of news
               coverage, measures of the relative importance of an issue in the minds of
               voters, and measures of congressional action on an issue. These studies
               find significant correlations (Tan & Weaver, 2007). Furthermore, media
               advocacy may be needed to “balance the playing field” when opposing
               forces have many resources. Media attention and public opinion are neces-
               sary to drive policy when the opposition may be able to forestall policy
               change by pooling financial resources and “buying votes” with political
               contributions (Wilson, 1980).


                  Attracting the Public’s Attention

                  The goals of media advocacy and message dissemination are the same.
               The first goal is to raise the public’s awareness of the issue (Figure 9.1, Link
               “d”)—in other words, to put it on the public agenda (Lippmann, 1965,
               p. 229). Lippmann was interested in explaining how the news media influ-
               enced what people thought. He argued that the “mass media are like the
               beam of a searchlight that moves restlessly about, bring one episode and
               then another out of the darkness into vision.” The underlying theory was
               transfer of salience (McCombs, Liamas, Lopez-Escobar, & Rey, 1997). The
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286