Page 64 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 64
Social Psychological Foundations of Social Marketing 57
Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffu-
sion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information processing view. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 38(1), 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514
.38.1.81
Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant
of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predic-
tive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength:
Antecedents and consequences. (pp. 93–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and
consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive
mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration
conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(1), 5–20. doi:
10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998a). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persua-
sion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook
of social psychology, Volume Two (pp. 323–390). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998b). Matching versus mismatching attitude
functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages. Personality and
Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 227–240. doi: 10.1177/0146167298243001
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current
status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories
in social psychology (pp. 37–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. H. (1998). Flexible correction processes in
social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16(1), 93–113.
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce
yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 874–884. doi:10.1037/0022-3514
.34.5.874
Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An
elaboration likelihood analysis. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate:
Functions of attitudes (pp. 133–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.) (1989). Attitude struc-
ture and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthi-
ness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness.
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 408–421. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP
1304_08
Razran, G. H. S. (1940). Conditioned response changes in rating and appraising
sociopolitical slogans. Psychological Bulletin, 37(48), 481.
Rhine, R. J., & Severance, L. J. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source
credibility, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
16(2), 175–190. doi: 10.1037/h0029832