Page 64 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 64

Social Psychological Foundations of Social Marketing                57

               Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffu-
                  sion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information processing view. Journal of
                  Personality and Social Psychology,  38(1), 81–92. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514
                  .38.1.81
               Petty, R. E., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant
                  of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predic-
                  tive of behavior. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.),  Attitude strength:
                  Antecedents and consequences. (pp. 93–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
                  Associates.
               Petty, R. E., & Krosnick, J. A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and
                  consequences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
               Petty, R. E., Schumann, D. W., Richman, S. A., & Strathman, A. J. (1993). Positive
                  mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration
                  conditions.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,  64(1), 5–20. doi:
                  10.1037/0022-3514.64.1.5
               Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998a). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persua-
                  sion variables. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook
                  of social psychology, Volume Two (pp. 323–390). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
               Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998b). Matching versus mismatching attitude
                  functions: Implications for scrutiny of persuasive messages.  Personality and
                  Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 227–240. doi: 10.1177/0146167298243001
               Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current
                  status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories
                  in social psychology (pp. 37–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
               Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & White, P. H. (1998). Flexible correction processes in
                  social judgment: Implications for persuasion. Social Cognition, 16(1), 93–113.
               Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce
                  yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal
                  of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 874–884. doi:10.1037/0022-3514
                  .34.5.874
               Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S. C., & Bizer, G. (2000). Matching effects in persuasion: An
                  elaboration likelihood analysis. In G. Maio & J. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate:
                  Functions of attitudes (pp. 133–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
               Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.) (1989). Attitude struc-
                  ture and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
               Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthi-
                  ness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness.
                  Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(4), 408–421. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP
                  1304_08
               Razran, G. H. S. (1940). Conditioned response changes in rating and appraising
                  sociopolitical slogans. Psychological Bulletin, 37(48), 481.
               Rhine, R. J., & Severance, L. J. (1970). Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source
                  credibility, and attitude change.  Journal  of Personality  and  Social  Psychology,
                  16(2), 175–190. doi: 10.1037/h0029832
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69