Page 92 - The Handbook of Persuasion and Social Marketing
P. 92

Persuasion in the Political Context                                 85

               altering the valence and volume of candidate coverage. Moreover, incum-
               bents presiding over periods of prosperity garner significantly more eco-
               nomic coverage as well as more favorable economic coverage than their
               opponents. In contrast, incumbents overseeing recessionary periods ap-
               pear to receive substantially more negative economic coverage than chal-
               lengers, as occurred in 1992. In combination, this suggests that information
               about the challenger is relatively unpersuasive to the public when the in-
               cumbent is well regarded.
                  Using national survey data collected between February and September
               of 2004, Malhotra and Krosnick (2007) inquired whether public approval
               of President George W. Bush’s handling of a series of specific national prob-
               lems (e.g., the Iraq war) influenced overall assessments of his job perform-
               ance and evaluations of his likely future performance versus John Kerry’s,
               and whether that, in turn, shaped voting choices. They observed that per-
               ceptions of President Bush’s handling of the war in Iraq, the economy, and
               terrorism all had impact on voting choices, but they were partly mediated
               by overall assessments of his job performance and by guesses about how
               well he and Senator Kerry would handle these issues in the future. These
               domain-specific prospective assessments were derived partly from percep-
               tions of the president’s handling of these domains in the past and partly by
               perceptions of his overall performance. Nevertheless, the situation in Iraq
               seemed to carry the most weight in driving overall performance evalua-
               tions and voting choices, whereas the other two domains had less
               impact.


               Image Priming

               Van der Brug, Semetko, and Valkenburg (2007), in their two-wave panel
               study on media priming effects in the context of a summit meeting of
               European Union leaders, observed that media priming effects occurred in
               connection with improved evaluations only for politicians who appeared
               visible in the news in connection with the European Union, especially
               Dutch prime minister Wim Kok and French president Jacques Chirac. In
               contrast, media priming effects did not occur for four political leaders who
               were not visible in the news in connection with Europe (U.S. president Bill
               Clinton and the leaders of three Dutch political parties: Frits Bolkestein of
               the Liberal Party, Paul Rosenmöller of the Greens, and Jaap de Hoop
               Scheffer of the Christian Democrats).
                  Analyzing the data from the 1988, 1993, and 1997 Canadian Election
               Studies, Gidengil, Blais, Nevitte, and Nadeau (2002) established that an
               election campaign generally primed the personal characteristics of party
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97